Inside the editorial page
Inside the editorial page

This blog is designed to give readers a glimpse of our editorial-page operation and how we make our decisions. We’ll let you know who we’re meeting with, what they’re telling us, what events and issues we’re looking at. We’ll also pass on information and observations that may not make our print editions. In addition to the editorial board members who post on this blog, the board includes Publisher David Zeeck, Executive Editor Karen Peterson and Managing Editor Dale Phelps.

Editorial board bloggers

Editorial page editor Patrick O’Callahan oversees the online and printed opinion sections of The News Tribune. He came to The News Tribune in 1987 and has worked at Washington newspapers since 1979. E-mail him at patrick.ocallahan@thenewstribune.com

Editorial writer Cheryl Tucker, in addition to writing commentary, manages the daily production of the editorial and op-ed pages and edits letters to the editor. She began her journalism career in 1974 at a Virginia newspaper and came to The News Tribune in 1978. E-mail her at cheryl.tucker@thenewstribune.com.

Editorial writer Kim Bradford manages the online opinion section of The News Tribune and writes commentary. She joined The News Tribune in 2005 after working 11 years at newspapers in Washington and Maryland. E-mail her at kim.bradford@thenewstribune.com.

Guest bloggers

Editor emeritus David Seago retired from The News Tribune in 2008 after 41 years at The News Tribune. E-mail him at sds99@harbornet.com.

Richard Davis’ column on state politics frequently runs in the print edition of The News Tribune. He was president of the Washington Research Council, a statewide think tank, from 1986 through 2006. Currently, as a principal with The Simeon Partnership, Inc. he coordinates the activities of the Washington Alliance for a Competitive Economy, a business coalition founded by the Research Council, the Association of Washington Business and the Washington Roundtable.

Karen Irwin of University Place, a mother of four, has been a frequent contributor to The News Tribune's print editions. She has also written for Seattle's Child, Puget Sound Parent, the Tacoma Weekly, the Fayetteville Observer Times and the political blog Right Meets Left. She graduated from California Lutheran University with a degree in English literature and is currently working toward a history degree.

Michael Allen, professor of history at the University of Washington Tacoma, was born and raised in Ellensburg. He served with the U.S. Marines in Vietnam from 1969-70. He has written five books, including the prize-winning "Patriot's History of the United States: From Columbus' Great Discovery to the War on Terror," "Rodeo Cowboys in the North American Imagination" and "Western Rivermen, 1763-1861: Ohio and Mississippi Boatmen and the Myth of the Alligator Horse." Allen lives in Tacoma and Ellensburg and has three children.

Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/tntopinion.

Calendar
November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • CustomScoop Email
  • artman77 Email
  • Guest Users: 304
What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers
Monday, March 10th, 2008
Posted by Kim Bradford @ 11:30:23 am

This is a side note to the heart of the debate over state lawmakers' attempt to roll a bunch of fee increases into one bill, but I can't let it pass.

Tim Eyman (whose Initiative 960 makes legislative approval of fee increases an issue) claims that voting on a package of increases violates the "spirit" of I-960. How rich.

It's not like the idea for this maneuver originated in the halls of the Capitol. No, it came straight from supporters of Eyman's tax-limiting measure who pooh-poohed allegations that I-960 would be too onerous.

The conservative Washington Policy Center – whose supportive three-part series on I-960 was widely cited by Eyman himself — suggested last fall:

While requiring legislative approval of all fee increases would increase legislative oversight and workload, one possible remedy would be to streamline the process by using omnibus bills that include many fee increases at once.

By doing this, legislative approval would still occur for all fee increases, but rather than considering a separate bill and taking a separate vote on each proposed increase, the legislature could combine them into one bill and one vote per agency. This is how lawmakers handled the wide range of tax increases they imposed in 2005, using one bill. The amendment process could be used to add or remove fee increases or to adjust the dollar amount of an increase.

Categories: Taking notice