Inside the editorial page
Inside the editorial page

This blog is designed to give readers a glimpse of our editorial-page operation and how we make our decisions. We’ll let you know who we’re meeting with, what they’re telling us, what events and issues we’re looking at. We’ll also pass on information and observations that may not make our print editions. In addition to the editorial board members who post on this blog, the board includes Publisher David Zeeck, Executive Editor Karen Peterson and Managing Editor Dale Phelps.

Editorial board bloggers

Editorial page editor Patrick O’Callahan oversees the online and printed opinion sections of The News Tribune. He came to The News Tribune in 1987 and has worked at Washington newspapers since 1979. E-mail him at patrick.ocallahan@thenewstribune.com

Editorial writer Cheryl Tucker, in addition to writing commentary, manages the daily production of the editorial and op-ed pages and edits letters to the editor. She began her journalism career in 1974 at a Virginia newspaper and came to The News Tribune in 1978. E-mail her at cheryl.tucker@thenewstribune.com.

Editorial writer Kim Bradford manages the online opinion section of The News Tribune and writes commentary. She joined The News Tribune in 2005 after working 11 years at newspapers in Washington and Maryland. E-mail her at kim.bradford@thenewstribune.com.

Guest bloggers

Editor emeritus David Seago retired from The News Tribune in 2008 after 41 years at The News Tribune. E-mail him at sds99@harbornet.com.

Richard Davis’ column on state politics frequently runs in the print edition of The News Tribune. He was president of the Washington Research Council, a statewide think tank, from 1986 through 2006. Currently, as a principal with The Simeon Partnership, Inc. he coordinates the activities of the Washington Alliance for a Competitive Economy, a business coalition founded by the Research Council, the Association of Washington Business and the Washington Roundtable.

Karen Irwin of University Place, a mother of four, has been a frequent contributor to The News Tribune's print editions. She has also written for Seattle's Child, Puget Sound Parent, the Tacoma Weekly, the Fayetteville Observer Times and the political blog Right Meets Left. She graduated from California Lutheran University with a degree in English literature and is currently working toward a history degree.

Michael Allen, professor of history at the University of Washington Tacoma, was born and raised in Ellensburg. He served with the U.S. Marines in Vietnam from 1969-70. He has written five books, including the prize-winning "Patriot's History of the United States: From Columbus' Great Discovery to the War on Terror," "Rodeo Cowboys in the North American Imagination" and "Western Rivermen, 1763-1861: Ohio and Mississippi Boatmen and the Myth of the Alligator Horse." Allen lives in Tacoma and Ellensburg and has three children.

Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/tntopinion.

Calendar
November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • Dirtdawg Email
  • Guest Users: 392
What's on the minds of Tacoma News Tribune editorial writers
Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008
Posted by David Seago @ 06:25:42 pm

Well, Dick Cheney really put his foot in it Monday when he made a wisecrack alluding to West Virginia and incest. Even the Republicans in West Virginia wanted to string him up.

So does University of Kansas professor Jerry Dobson, who calls "the Appalachian people" "the most scorned minority in America."

I had no idea. But for a full dose of the professor's outrage, click "More" to see the oped he sent around the country today.

[More:]

Dear Op-Ed Editor:
Cheney’s Favorite Minority Joke
by
Jerome E. Dobson

On Monday, Vice President Cheney said, “So we had Cheneys on both sides of the family — and we don’t even live in West Virginia.” His gratuitous insult raises again the question: What’s the most scorned minority in America?

A partial list of candidates can be found in U. S. Census tables of races, origins, languages, and ancestries. To measure the level of scorn, consider the virulence of epithets and stereotypes applied to group members. Consider whether society accords legal protections and benefits and, conversely, reprimands adversaries who openly discriminate, use racial or ethnic slurs, show bias in hiring, or commit acts of hatred. Consider what people say about them and how they are portrayed in movies, television, and theater.

Which minority fares worst? In this supposedly enlightened age, there is one that still can be routinely portrayed on TV as dim-witted and cruel. . .slandered with the foulest of stereotypes. . .called by ethnic epithets. . .reviled by people who do not regard themselves as prejudiced and who are not regarded by others as being prejudiced. . .one that is clearly disadvantaged but receives no minority benefits and protections. . .one exempt somehow from America’s passion for diversity.

The answer, of course, is rural people (hicks, bumpkins, yokels) and among them Southern whites (rednecks, bubbas, crackers, white trash) and among them Appalachian whites
(hillbillies). It’s somehow OK in polite conversation to call them derogatory names, characterize
class=Section2>
them as ignorant no matter how much schooling they’ve had, slander them with stereotypes, and make fun of their food and speech.

What is the most vile stereotype leveled at any minority in America? Surely nothing matches incest. Yet Appalachian people are routinely accused of incest, and there is no social rebuke for those who demonize them so.

The depth of bigotry against Appalachian people, my people, was brought home to me in a very personal way at a national meeting of an academic association. A geographer delivered a fascinating analysis of the U. S. Census 2000, pointing out that Appalachian people typically identify themselves by “American ancestry” far more than any other group. He showed strong geographic correlations with income, education, and religion.

When he finished, a colleague asked, “Did you try correlating that with incest?” I was stunned, and so was my wife who, by the way, is not my sister or daughter.

The speaker answered, “I don’t think the government keeps figures on incest.” No one else complained or even remarked on the questioner’s scurrilous, unsupported indictment of our relatives, friends, and neighbors back home.

class=Section3>

I faced the offender and said, “What do you think would have happened if you had said that about any other group in this country?”

Indeed, if Mr. Cheney had accused any other Americans of incest, there would have been indignant calls for his immediate resignation.

Insults hurt even those of us who succeed in the broader society. For many others, the cost is greater as upward mobility is hampered by bias in hiring and promotion due to widespread disdain for cultural traits such as dialect, religion, and clothing. Viewed with contempt even by many who champion other minorities, Appalachian people truly constitute a minority disadvantaged in status, income, education, wealth, power, health, and other key indicators of lifestyle and welfare.

All my life, I checked the box “American” for my ethnicity or stubbornly wrote “American” if there wasn’t a box for it, not knowing the choice was characteristic of my region. I knew why I did it, and the speaker confirmed why so many Appalachian people do: They have lived here so long that no one identifies with the places their ancestors, chiefly Scots-Irish, came from. Most of all, as James Webb states so convincingly in Born Fighting, they hold a deeply ingrained egalitarian attitude that we’re all just Americans; it doesn’t matter where anyone came from.

So, there you have it. The most scorned minority in America are people who call themselves simply “Americans.” How ironic! Imagine the headline, “VEEP ACCUSES AMERICANS OF INCEST!”

Categories: Taking notice