Listening to Dennis Kucinich – and now Jim McDermott – you have to believe they are serious about impeaching George W. Bush.

Given that Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders treat the idea as if it were radioactive, impeachment was a quixotic notion from the start.

But with only four months remaining in Bush's tenure, when – exactly – are the impeachment and subsequent Senate trial supposed to take place?

While members of Congress are busy running for re-election between now and November? In the brief lame-duck session after the election?

Even McDermott has to realize this just ain't going to happen. I could kind of understand it if he'd signed on earlier, but why wait until the clock has run out before joining the team?

1. A November ballot measure that would ban casinos in Lakewood has forced City Manager Andrew Neiditz to propose two city budgets: a status quo spending plan that assumes the ballot measure will lose and a "Plan B" that assumes it will prevail. The gap between the two shows just how addicted the city government is to gambling revenues – which amount to a stealth tax on the poor and gullible.

2. Add this to the list of what's riding on the outcome of the 2008 presidential election: Boeing's chance of nabbing a $35 billion Air Force tanker contract.

About our editorials:
If you have comments or questions about these topics, please email them to patrick.ocallahan@thenewstribune.com. Editorials represent the consensus view of The News Tribune's editorial board.
Want to sit in on a daily ed board meeting? Email cheryl.tucker@thenewstribune.com to make an appointment.

At last week's City Club of Tacoma forum for Pierce County executive candidates, the League of Women Voters gave audience members a tutorial on ranked-choice voting.

The race was to name the two Tacoma Narrows' bridges. The winners: Olympic and Cascade.

It seems some "voters" had trouble figuring out how to mark their ballots (which is strange since such basics don't change with an RCV election), and others didn't understand there's no advantage in voting the same choice all three times.

This was our first large group for teaching RCV. Our key point was that Ranked Choice Voting for the voter is as easy as One, Two, Three. The only complicated part is the counting which will be done a computer. Please let your readers know we can do the same thing for their group as we did at the City Club.

Some interesting items: People circled their choice, checked their choice, and one even circled the arrow but most connected the arrow as they were supposed to. I made the point to the group that the machine can only read the connected arrow and anything else will have to be handcounted which was complicated.

Several people only voted for one, several voted for the same for all three. The other point we made is that you don't have to vote for all three. You can vote for one, two, or three. Voting the same doesn't change anything.
Another point to make is that for the election they can vote for any party they want, even different parties in each column.

The final result from the City Club was Cascade for the Old Bridge and Olympic for the New Bridge. It was an extremely close vote though with Old and New and Gerty and Gordy just one point behind. We will continue to do this exercise at each of our forums and I'll let you know the updates.

Thanks for your interest.
Terri Baker, 1st VP, LWV

Here's a Mike Peters cartoon I guarantee will not turn up in the printed edition.

I just wouldn't want to field the irate phone calls that morning!