Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • CustomScoop Email
  • pcoddin Email
  • swamback Email
  • TruBlu Email
  • artman77 Email
  • Guest Users: 473
Let's talk politics.
Tuesday, October 30th, 2007
Posted by Peter Callaghan @ 08:54:01 am

The new Washington Poll was released last night and shows that most of the statewide ballot measures – as well as Puget Sound's Prop. 1 – are in the hands of voters who haven't made up their minds.

So if you haven't mailed in your ballot yet, expect to become very popular with the campaigns.

The poll asked 600 voters how they intended to vote. That means the results have a margin of error of 4 percent.

On Initiative 960, which would require two-thirds votes for future tax increases, 41 percent said they were certain to vote yes or were leaning that way. The certain and likely no vote totaled 40 percent. But 18 percent of those polled said they were undecided or didn't know how they would vote.

On the insurance reform measure Referendum 67, a total of 48 percent of voters said they would support, while 31 percent said they would oppose. But only 35 percent of the yes votes said they were certain of their vote, with the rest saying they could change their minds. And 21 percent were still undecided.

Bigger majorities were supporting the Rainy Day fund (61 percent to 17 percent) and the Simple Majority for School Levies measure (59 percent to 31 percent).

The poll provides a less-exact look at the Roads and Transit measure because the sample size is much smaller – only 325 voters were surveyed producing a margin of error of 5.4 percent). The results (43 percent in support and 46 percent opposed) is well within the margin of error, making the issue too close to predict.

Categories: Campaign news, Transit