|
|
|
|
Friday, April 18th, 2008
Posted by Hunter George @ 05:00:22 am
Last year, the state Department of Ecology sent warning letters (it calls them "education" letters) to some 20,000 people. But the department refuses to give us the list of who got those education letters. That doesn't seem right, does it? Here's the issue: The Department of Ecology encourages the public to report people who litter. You may have seen the ads promoting the "Litter And It Will Hurt" campaign. You can call a hotline - 866-LITTER-1 (548-8371) - or fill out a form on the agency's Web site. Basically, if you see someone toss a cigarette butt (or anything else) out of a window, you note the vehicle license plate, description of the vehicle, date and time and location. The state can’t issue a citation since a cop didn’t see it. But Ecology has an arrangement with another state agency, the Department of Licensing, to identify the owner of each license plate that's reported. Then Ecology mails that person a warning a letter that says, in effect, "a fellow citizen saw someone throw litter from a vehicle registered to you; if you’re ever caught in the act, you'll pay a $1,025 fine." We believe the list of people who get that warning letter from the state should be a matter of public record. The state, after all, has taken an action, even though it's a warning and not an actual citation. But Ecology won’t give us the names. The agency's public disclosure officer discussed my request with two assistant attorneys general who represent the agency, and they decided that the information is protected by the federal driver privacy law. Here's what Ecology told us in response to our request:
Instead of the list of names, the Department of Ecology offered to provide statistical information. For example, the agency can tell us how many letters it sent out during a particular month. That's not good enough. We can find out who got traffic tickets on our roads and highways. We can find out who crossed the Narrows bridge without paying a toll. We can find out who got nabbed by a red-light camera at an intersection. If police issue a written warning to someone, that information is based on driver's license information, and it becomes public because of the action taken. We should be able to find out who has been the subject of littering complaints. As for the contract that Ecology signed with Licensing, that's irrelevant. An agency can't promise another agency to keep something secret if the information is public. Update: Here's a copy of the education letter. We're still working to get the list. I'll keep you posted.
Categories: Governor, Open Government, State government
• 2 comments
COMMENTS:
A littering complaint is hearsay, without a person having any chance to defend him or herself or clear the record. No official wrote a ticket- we don't even have a camera having taken a picture.
So why does the News Tribune want this hearsay? What valid reason do you have? And how do you intend to use this hearsay? What if someone just called in a bunch of license plates from the News Tribune parking lot? Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment. |
Political Buzz
A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered. Contributors
Niki Sullivan covers politics. Before coming to Tacoma, she covered state government in Oregon. She is a regular contributor to the GritCity blog. Email Niki Local politics links
• Chris Mulick's Olympia Dispatch• Brad Shannon's Campaign Trail • Postman on Politics • Sound Politics • Horse's Ass • Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia • P-I's Strange Bedfellows Category
Calendar
Archives
What is RSS? Misc
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||