A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.
Contributors
Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the
statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News
Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett
and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and
Seattle. Email
Peter
Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation
issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom
in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall,
Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe
David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to
The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in
Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David
Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in
database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has
previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at
work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News
Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the
state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for
The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les
John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the
Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and
state government, the environment and growth. Email John
• Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
• Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
• Sound Politics
• Horse's Ass
• Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
• P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
• Crosscut
• Statewide School Employee Pay
• City of Tacoma Employee Pay
• Pierce County Employee Pay
• King County Employee Pay
• Metro Parks Employee Pay
• City of Lakewood Employee Pay
• City of Puyallup Employee Pay
• Pierce Transit Employee Pay
• How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org
- All
- Attorney General (145)
- Auditor (41)
- Campaign news (1063)
- Congress (198)
- Education (71)
- Environment (17)
- Federal Government (8)
- Funny stuff (57)
- Governor (662)
- Initiatives and Referenda (147)
- Insurance Commissioner (26)
- Journalism (32)
- King County (143)
- Lands Commissioner (41)
- Legislature (1114)
- Lobbying (34)
- Lt. Governor (36)
- Media (1)
- Open Government (38)
- Pierce County (537)
- President (480)
- Inauguration (25)
- Stimulus (12)
- Public Safety (44)
- Ruston (12)
- Schools Superintendent (65)
- Seattle (54)
- Secretary of State (83)
- State budget (387)
- State government (942)
- Suburbs (48)
- Supreme Court (41)
- Tacoma (421)
- Taxes (183)
- Transit (122)
- Transportation (115)
- Treasurer (31)
- Voting (260)
- Washington State Patrol (4)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
- July 2009 (6)
- June 2009 (138)
- May 2009 (164)
- April 2009 (273)
- March 2009 (202)
- February 2009 (148)
- January 2009 (182)
- December 2008 (158)
- November 2008 (240)
- October 2008 (175)
- September 2008 (127)
- August 2008 (110)
- More...
Point Ruston LLC, the developer planning to build a mix of residential and commercial buildings on the old Asarco smelter site, wants the City of Tacoma to find a way for it to qualify for the city's multi-family tax exemption.
Loren Cohen, legal affairs manager for the developer, sent a letter to Tacoma Mayor Bill Baarsma and Councilman Spiro Manthou earlier this month, asking city officials to consider making some changes in the city's code that would allow the project to qualify for the incentive.
Specifically, Cohen wants the city to add language making it clear that an area with existing "or previous" businesses would meet the definition of an "urban center." Although it's vacant now, the property has been the site of numerous businesses for over a century, Cohen wrote, including sawmills and the smelter. From the April 11 letter;
As the City moves through its modifications to the City's Tax Exemption it should surely contemplate adding these 2 words -- which at this point out right disallow the possibility of a tax exemption to the Point Ruston project. When such a code amendment has been adopted, Point Ruston would follow the given procedure to propose a Comprehensive Plan amendment to add the project site as a Mixed Use Center within the city.
At least one council member doesn't support the idea.
Councilman Mike Lonergan sent Baarsma an e-mail saying in part:
It would appear to miss the whole point of our mixed-use center tax abatement, which has to do with encouraging (re)development density in transit oriented centers and neighborhood business districts, as a method of complying with Growth Management Act. ... The letter would appear to turn the whole policy on its head -- once a development well outside the designated areas is well on its way, we should grant the tax abatement as a way of rewarding the development.
But Manthou said Tuesday that he thinks Cohen makes a "pretty good case" and the city should consider the request. Manthou acknowledged that the Point Ruston project would mark the city's first use of the incentive for a specific project, and it may not be the best option for helping the development. "Is there another incentive we can grant?" he asked. Cohen is "sticking his neck out" to reclaim a Superfund site, Manthou said. "We need to look at what we can do to help. Maybe this isn't the right way to go."
COMMENTS:
Bambie1 - You're right, we certainly do not need to be offering additional tax breaks to high-end luxury condos that don't fit the stated purpose of the program. However, I think the program should remain in place to encourage some infill growth in areas in need of some help and to keep us on track with our Growth Management Act objectives. It may need to be re-evaluated and tweaked here and there, but I think the program still has merit.
The program is designed to save the loss of farmland, reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Tacoma is currently failing the pollution standard.
Better to have high density development concentrated in urban areas than losing huge amount of farm land to suburban development.
Plus, it is very expensive to try to serve remote developments with services such as police and and with gas prices continuing, yet further remote development is unsustainable.
However, the question for Point Ruston development is: does it make sense in a growth management perspective for the City of Tacoma to try concentrate growth at that location?
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.
