|
|
|
|
Friday, April 25th, 2008
Posted by Joe Turner @ 12:34:04 pm
James Vaughn, a former Army officer, says he's among a group of veterans who are upset over the war in Iraq and are running for office. He says he's also an ex-Marine, Navy corpsman and theology student. He lives in Orting with his fiancee. Read on:
Categories: Congress, Campaign news
• 11 comments
COMMENTS:
Mr. Vaughn:
Welcome to the race! I noted your service in the Army and other services, so you are the only other veteran, along with C. Mark Greene (Marines and Coast Guard), to be in the 8th District contest. If I am not mistaken, Reichert and Burner did not serve in the Armed Forces. It is good to see that the 8th District election will be a wide open race (the more, the merrier), and will not necessarily be controlled by the campaigns with the most money from corporate titans and Beverly Hills/Hollywood-type philanthropists.
Wow, 21 billion in foreign aid... on a 3+ trillion dollar budget. I wonder why we provide foreign aid. Oh yeah, so that children in Pakistan can go to secular schools instead of Madrases and so that we can encourage stability in volatile regions such as the Horn of Africa. The idea is that by investing a little now in aid we don't have to invest a lot later by sending our troops into harm's way. It's part of a forward thinking foreign policy. Cutting foreign aid is an over-used and washed up campaign promise. You are trying to exploit xenophobic sentiments by talking about foreign aid, foreign investment, and foreign students at our universities. Your understanding of the global economy and conservation of labor is a little weak. I appreciate you joining the race; and wish you the best of luck. Semper Fi!
Dear Evergreen,
Sally, my fiance and I were discussing your statement regarding my comments coming across as arrogant. I feel that it is necessary to take a particularly strong stand on certain issues. However, you have made me take a second look at how I will present my positions so that I am not perceived as such. I do have serious concerns when candidates make comments that could place our service members in greater danger. I also believe that a campaign should be about the issues and candidates need to be challenged. Hopefully, we will all benefit from hard critiques and serious dialogues. Jim
Dear Juzado,
We need to dramatically reduce the amount of tax dollars that are sent to other countries. Being a Good Samaritan is honorable. However, we need to look at what we can and cannot afford. Many individual have expressed to me that “Charity begins at home.” Your government tax dollars should be utilized within the United States. No one is stopping individuals from sending money to other countries. That is the role of the International Red Cross, the United Nations, religious and civic organizations. It should not be the role of the government. Last year over $21 Billion dollars was spent on Foreign Aid. The complaints regarding foreign aid include: • That it is used to create foreign markets, especially for arms sales. • Corruption is a major problem – many funds end up in private bank accounts. • Leaders get the money, not the people. • Richer nations receive the most. I believe there are avenues to assist other countries than our current foreign aid policies. Economy: It is widely recognized that the U.S. economy is showing the signs of wear and tear. I have significant concerns about a stock market crash or whether bank credit collapses. I propose that even a recession can be devastatingly painful for the average American. The last time our country experienced a true recession was the period between 1972-1974. It was here that the country got its first real post-World War II economic slowdown, accompanied by a bear market in stocks. Gross Domestic Product growth slowed tremendously, unemployment rose, incomes fell, and considerable discomfort was felt by all. It was also during this period that America first opened her borders to free trade with other nations, and we became officially an "open" economy. As bad as the recession of 1972-74 was, America still had her industrial base to support her throughout. When the recession cleared, we were able to go immediately back to business as usual without too much trouble, thanks to our strong manufacturing economy. Today, our industrial support is gone and we are no longer an industrial economy. Industry today thrives mainly in Third World countries where cheap labor is abundant. In addition, our remaining agricultural support base is rapidly deteriorating. In short, all that remains are services. It remains to be seen how our service-based economy will carry us through during such a time. Services, after all, depend largely on discretionary incomes and relative prosperity. This is not true of manufacturing which is needed at all times (though in varying degrees). As our economy turns down, how will most service industries make money when discretionary income has largely vanished? The only persons who seem to have comprehended the enormity of our plight are the members of the Federal Reserve, who have cut interest rates. But will their efforts prevail? WASHINGTON (AP) – “Congressional leaders announced a deal with the White House Thursday on an economic stimulus package that would give most tax filers refunds of $600 to $1,200, and more if they have children. “ Since we have become a service-based economy, it is the discretionary funds that keep our economy moving. For this reason, the Economic Stimulus Package will work as a quick fix. It will also make everyone feel good in an election year. However, the less tax money at the Federal Level, because our government gave up $170 Billion in taxes with this Economic Stimulus Package, means less money will filter down to our state. The federal government still provides us with a significant amount of revenue, in the form of block grants, but the overall pie is shrinking. As a result, we will have more responsibility for children's health, mass transit, highways, and welfare reform. In this time of war and recession, our state budget is plunging into a sea of red ink. Unlike the federal government, we are required by our state constitution to have a balanced budget. We have planned for lean years and natural disasters by setting aside money from budget surpluses for "rainy-day" reserve funds. But a fiscal monsoon has hit, and the rapidly declining fortunes are quickly depleting our reserves. To make matter worse, a study has found that the United States' growing trade deficit with China has had an increasingly negative impact on the U.S. economy, causing job losses that reach into the most technologically advanced industries in the manufacturing sector and affect every state, according to a January 11 ,2005 press release by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC). The outlook in 2005 does not appear to be improving and I am also concerned that we are becoming an economic hostage to Communist China. We are now are now starting into a recession as a service economy with a huge budget deficit and a huge trade deficit. It was not too many years ago that our service members defend democracy against communism along the Iron Curtain. Now it is time to economically defend our country against Communist China. The standard answer in our state has been to raise or create new taxes. We need to run our country like a business and remove the waste. We also need to hold government agencies accountable for expenditures and accurate reporting. We accomplish that by implementing quality control mechanisms through out all levels of government. Hopefully, this will explain why I am so concerned about government expenses. We are loosing our shirt in the global economy. Jim
Dear Amanda,
How about giving me some specifics. I have been in D.C. after the first Gulf War working on the downsizing of the military. Not as green as you might think. I suspect you disagree with some of my positions and would like to know what they are. By addressing the issues, I realize that I will loose some votes. We have serious problems that need to be addressed. I believe that the candidates need to take a stand on all of the issues. This will give the voters the information needed to make an informed decision come election time. Jim
We are becoming "an economic hostage to Communist China" because we are deficit financing a rather expensive war. Rather than raise taxes so that Americans at home share the burden with those serving in uniform, the Bush administration has elected to seek emergency appropriation after emergency appropriation (which Congress duly approves) to fund the conflict. This need for cash forces us to sell debt which China and other countries happily buy. The result, our kids pay for our war plus interest. No amount of government efficiency that you are proposing is going to generate enough cash for us to pay for the war and the debt on the war thus far. Are you willing to vote to cut off war funding? Are you willing to raise taxes to fully fund the war rather than finance it with debt? If you can't answer yes to one of these questions, then you are going to be perpetuating foreign ownership of U.S. debt which you identify as a grave danger to our country. I appreciate your willingness to engage on these issues, but if you buy into the ideas in the Federalist Papers you know that government cannot run like a business because it was specifically designed not to.
Best, John
juzado,
I agree that government cannot run like a business. I run the danger by taking a position and presenting solutions or options. This is particularly true when I am painting a broad brush picture for a wide variety of issues. My intent is to allow the voters to get an idea of who I am and my thought processes. I am extremely concerned about the economy and the issues you presented. Here are my thoughts. We all would like to see our troops come home. However, common sense tells us that this is not going to happen overnight. We have lost too many lives in this war and too much is at stake for us not to achieve stabilization and the proper reconstruction of Iraq. I feel a moral conviction to choose the right course of action not only for our country but for the Iraqi citizens. With that in mind, I would like to create an agreement with the new government in Iraq in regards to financially reimbursing us for our efforts. Given our current deficit, rising gasoline prices, we need Iraq to help us financially in order to continue to help them restore their country. Iraq has the second largest oil deposits in the world and by receiving a portion of the oil we can correct our federal deficit. In addition, we can ship the oil directly to China and reduce our huge trade deficit. As a result, our dollar will strengthen and hopefully our gasoline prices at home will decline. Now that we are mired in rebuilding Iraq, a responsible exit strategy is essential. Unfortunately, I hear candidates spouting anti-war rhetoric and an immediate reduction in troops. These comments do nothing but incite the terrorists and place our service members in greater danger. We need to remember the saying, “United We Stand, Divided We fall.”
Dear Juzado,
I almost forgot to address running a government like a business. By this I mean accurate reporting, quality control mechanisms throughout all agencies. The VA has a serious problem with, and so does our governor.Christine used a Forbes Magazine article to claim that Washington State was the 5th best state in the nation for doing business. When we contacted the author of that article and addressed that many sources quoted our state as the 10th worst in the nation for business. He agreed with our business tax problem and said he gave our state the ranking based upon items such as quality of life and other factors. I get frustrated with government that puts something in writing and expects that we should take this as gospel. Just because it is written down somewhere does not necessarily make it true. Since I am challenging individuals, I expect and deserve to be challenged I also see individuals milking the welfare, L&I and unemployment systems on a daily basis. We offer them work and they refuse. They don't get serious about working until their unemployment runs out. Why are we paying TransCore $18.7 million dollars to collect the tolls on the narrows bridge, when we pay people on L&I, Welfare and Unemployment to sit at home? My point being is that you would not see this in the business world. Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment. |
Political Buzz
A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered. Contributors
Niki Sullivan covers politics. Before coming to Tacoma, she covered state government in Oregon. She is a regular contributor to the GritCity blog. Email Niki Local politics links
• Chris Mulick's Olympia Dispatch• Brad Shannon's Campaign Trail • Postman on Politics • Sound Politics • Horse's Ass • Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia • P-I's Strange Bedfellows Category
Calendar
Archives
What is RSS? Misc
Who's Online?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||