Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • rkhoov Email
  • Discnutt Email
  • tom0755 Email
  • Hawkcrazy
  • gregoryrobinson Email
  • benderjj Email
  • VisitingFan Email
  • Larry LaRue Email
  • Moosestock Email
  • mustang480 Email
  • mentops Email
  • artman77 Email
  • Guest Users: 688
Let's talk politics.
Thursday, June 26th, 2008
Posted by Joe Turner @ 05:01:47 pm

The writing is on the wall. It's looking more and more as if there will be a multibillion-dollar bus-and-rail measure on the ballot this fall.

Respondents also expressed urgency around when to move forward with a new transit ballot measure: 76 percent favor a 2008 vote, 10 percent favor a 2010 vote, 3 percent favor voting after 2010 and 5 percent said never.

Although Sound Transit notes its poll is not scientific, they continue to build a case for another vote on transit. This one will be about $10 billion instead of $18 billion, the amount of Proposition 1, which was trounced at the polls last November.

Here's Sound Transit's release:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE — June 26, 2008

Citizens speak out on mass transit expansion options

The Sound Transit Board today heard the public’s latest input on expanding the region’s mass transit system. The Board thanked the thousands of community members who responded to the call to help shape the expansion options through 6,077 responses to a Website and telephone questionnaire and 4,015 written responses.

The input reflects a strong sense of urgency for expanding light rail, commuter rail and regional express bus service around the region. Among citizens who took the non-scientific questionnaire:
--91 percent say it’s extremely or somewhat urgent to expand mass transit
--81 percent say it's extremely or somewhat urgent to add more light rail
--81 percent say it's extremely or somewhat urgent to add more commuter rail
--81 percent say it's extremely or somewhat urgent to add more express bus

[More:]

“The public clearly wants mass transit expanded to provide relief from gas prices and global warming,” said Sound Transit Board Chair and Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels. “This input will help the Sound Transit Board determine the right priorities and timing for a ballot measure.”

In May the Sound Transit Board sought public review of transit expansion options for a ballot measure in 2008 in 2010. The public commented on two new options that Sound Transit could complete in 12 years, as well as the larger 20-year package that was part of last year’s unsuccessful Roads & Transit measure, Proposition 1. The new 12-year options would cost 62 percent to 67 percent less than Proposition 1’s total based on the fact the measure would be transit-only and fund a smaller set of transit projects. A 20-year transit-only package would cost about one-third less than the last year’s Roads & Transit measure.

All of the options would make major expansions to the regional transit system, ranging from 18 to 50 miles of new Link light rail expanding north, south and across Lake Washington, along with improvements to Sounder commuter rail and ST Express regional bus service and facilities. Detailed information is available at www.soundtransit.org.

One of the two new 12-year options would be funded by a sales tax increase of four-tenths of one percent (0.4 percent), while the second would add one-tenth of one percent for a total of 0.5 percent. This increase of either four or five cents on a $10 purchase would cost a typical adult about $55 or $69 each year, respectively. Asked their preferences between the new 12-year options, 46 percent of respondents favored the 0.5 percent option, 24 percent favored the 0.4 percent option, and 24 percent did not like either.

The highest level of support was for the largest transit package option: a 20-year plan funded by a sales tax increase of 0.5 percent, or about $69 per year per adult. The 20-year option was favored by 43 percent of respondents, while 31 percent favored a 12-year plan, and 14 percent did not support either.

Respondents also expressed urgency around when to move forward with a new transit ballot measure: 76 percent favor a 2008 vote, 10 percent favor a 2010 vote, 3 percent favor voting after 2010 and 5 percent said never.

The latest public input comes on the heels of an earlier round in the first quarter of 2008 that helped shape the options circulated for review in May. In the first quarter, support for mass transit expansion was further reinforced by a scientific telephone survey of 800 randomly selected residents. Details of both the first and second quarter input are available at www.soundtransit.org.

In July, the Sound Transit Board will decide whether to move forward with a ballot measure in 2008 or wait until 2010.

Sound Transit’s system of regional express buses, commuter rail and light rail currently carries about 50,000 riders each day, a number that will more than double following the 2009 opening of light rail service between downtown Seattle and Sea-Tac International Airport. Construction of that light rail line is moving forward on schedule and is now more than 90 percent complete.

Expansion of Link light rail between downtown and the University of Washington is slated to begin this year and be completed in 2016. University Link is projected to nearly triple the regional light rail system’s ridership to more than 114,000 a day by 2030. The Federal Transit Administration has awarded the University Link project its highest rating for proposed transit projects in the nation, and the Bush administration included $100 million for the project in its proposed FY 2009 budget.

Categories: Campaign news, Transit 3 comments

COMMENTS:

johnesherman @ 17:46 - Thursday, June 26th, 2008 Email

Somebody should start planning where are all the personal passenger cars going to park at these light rail, commuter rail, and express bus stations locations? Because, some news reports report that parking your personal car at a rail or express bus station location is beginning to become problematical to find a parking spot for the day? If you don't find a parking spot; as a result, you just drive your car to your destination. You gotta get to the transit hubs before the new transit systems are usable by mass ridership, but maybe transit station parking is not a problem when quoting ridership increases of more-than-double on some routes by end of 2009? As a bicycle-riding-observer; it follows, I will wait to see just how many people do benefit in future years?

Daniel K @ 22:47 - Thursday, June 26th, 2008
http://www.kirkdorffer.com/ontheroadto2008/
Whatever they do they need to bring the system on in sections so that people can start using this sooner than later. Maybe the entire project won't be completed in 12 or 20 years, but certainly parts of it should be, so bring it online in a gradually expanding manner.

The reality is that in 20 years a great many of the people who will pay for this construction today will have moved away or died. Therefore we need project plans that can start to deliver something after just a few years, even if it is just a stop or two along a new line.
JohnSN @ 18:14 - Friday, June 27th, 2008 Email
Mr. Turner writes, "It's looking more and more as if there will be a multibillion-dollar bus-and-rail measure on the ballot this fall."

However, the discussion held on Thursday afternoon June 26 at the Sound Transit Board meeting does not necessarily support this conclusion.

The video recording of this meeting is posted at http://www.soundtransit.org/x4976.xml.

Here are some highlights:

Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, the Board chairman, presented a "chairman's draft plan" for more Sound Transit spending that requires voters approving a 1/2 cent sales tax increase, doubling ST's tax, and using the extra money to build light rail to Highline College, Northgate, and the Eastside via the I-90 floating bridge. There are additionally some other commuter rail and bus elements, although most money goes to light rail construction.

There was an extended discussion of this draft plan, and a fair amount of praise from Board members, but no vote was held to approve it, because -- as Chairman Nickels explained -- a Board consensus to approve it does not yet appear to exist.

Two out of the 3-member Snohomish County delegation made clear that they did not support this draft plan as it stands now, because it does not build light rail into Snohomish County. There were no other Board member statements of non-support, but there were some cautions about presenting too expensive a plan, and some Board members who simply remained silent.

At two hours and six minutes into the meeting recording, Snohomish County Executive Reardon stated that he is "not as confident as he once was" that an acceptable plan can be devised this summer. ST staff are saying November 2008 or November 2010 are the next two best times for holding a new public vote on Sound Transit expansion.

To get on the ballot this autumn, a 2/3 super-majority vote of the 18-member board is needed either on July 10 or July 24, which means at least 12 votes.

Mayor Nickels use of the word "consensus" in Board meetings tells me that he wants to find ways to avoid any recorded negative votes on a plan to be presented to the voters.

In summary, watching the June 26 meeting provides a much clearer view of where ST expansion stands than the press release above.

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.