Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • Larry LaRue Email
  • davidlsmith Email
  • Don Ruiz Email
  • Oldslow Email
  • envyoushawk Email
  • Guest Users: 600
Let's talk politics.
Monday, June 30th, 2008
Posted by David Wickert @ 12:56:46 pm

The Pierce County Council’s Rules Committee this morning killed a proposed ballot measure that would have asked voters to raise property taxes to preserve farmland and other open space.

By a vote of 3-0, the committee voted to postpone the measure – proposed by County Executive John Ladenburg – indefinitely.

Committee members cited unanswered questions, falling home values and a lack of accountability in the proposal as reasons to table it. They spoke of improving it and possibly trying again in 2009.

The proposal would have asked voters in November to raise property taxes by up to 16 cents per $1,000 assessed value to buy the development rights to farmland, timberland, recreational property and other open space for preservation. The money would have been used to repay the cost of bonds used to pay for the program.

It would have raised an estimated $8.7 million in 2009. According to Ladenburg, it would have cost the owner of a $300,000 house a little more than $2 a month.

The executive billed the program as a way to preserve precious land in a county that is rapidly developing. He said it could be used to buy farmland in rural areas or remaining open spaces in urban areas.

But County Council members expressed concern over the lack of a specific list of properties to be preserved. They also had questions about how land would be chosen for preservation. And they expressed concern that raising taxes at a time of falling property values would be a bad idea.

“I think we are in volatile times,” said Councilman Shawn Bunney, R-Lake Tapps, a member of the Rules Committee.

Councilman Calvin Goings, D-Puyallup, said he’s working on a proposal to establish a task force to address some of the council’s questions and report back early next year. He said it’s possible the county could take a proposal to voters in 2009.

“I think it’s incumbent on us to move forward with a Plan B,” Goings said.

Categories: Pierce County 4 comments

COMMENTS:

ldozy123 @ 14:14 - Monday, June 30th, 2008 Email
Thank you Thank you thank you!
We need some time to really look into this for the good of Pierce County... not just a campaign ploy.
Hats off County Council- and thanks for helping us dodge another Ladenburg pitfall.
lorenbliss @ 16:04 - Monday, June 30th, 2008 Email
The ongoing collapse of the petroleum-fueled transport system -- already inflating the cost of basic foods beyond lower-income affordability -- mandates immediate action to preserve and expand local agricultural capabilities. Increasingly, because of skyrocketing transportation costs, the only affordable food is locally grown food -- a dire trend that can only worsen as the oil runs out and terminal climate change intensifies. But crisis is profitable -- just look at the petroleum industry’s balance sheets -- and to expect Big Business-owned politicians to protect us from the depredations of their masters is sheer denial: like imagining that Black Widow spiders aren't poisonous or that cancer doesn't kill. At the very least, Mr. Ladenburg's uniquely perceptive and exceptionally forward-looking proposal should have been kept alive for ongoing consideration. The fact it was killed -- and killed by bipartisan action -- is yet another proof there is not one scintilla of meaningful difference between Republicans and Democrats: the former make no secret of the fact they represent only wealthy predators, while the latter merely lie to give us false hope: the Democrats pretend to serve the common good but predictably betray us to the Republicans (and thus to the predators) at every possible opportunity.
ldozy123 @ 19:39 - Monday, June 30th, 2008 Email
It wasn't killed.. just not thrown at the voters full of the pitfalls and legal mishaps the last minute proposal demonstrated. It is better to have this fully outlined and designed to really protect our rapidly decreasing open spaces. I hope they convene a citizen panel also- lets REALLY develop one to meet and protect our dwindling resources... just don't take an obviously campaign game like the one that was proposed. Too many unanswered questions and pretty significant concerns were left with this first draft.

jegggo @ 22:17 - Monday, June 30th, 2008 Email
John Ladenburg has to be the most stupid politician this county has ever had to deal with. How did this schmuck ever get into any office that smell's political?
His stupid Idea on the golf course isn't panning as expected (nor will it) and now this stupid Idea of Increasing taxes! This fool must be smoking some serious CRACK. If Johnny Ladenburg can't figure it out that all the county has to do to preserve any piece of land for farming is simply to only allow the said land for farming, it is that simple. After all they tell anyone they think has wet lands what they can do with there land, oh yeah and did I mention open space? The county can and will zone your land to whatever they want you to be able to do with it! Not saying it is right but they (the county) has always decided what zoning goes for what land. So all they have to do is zone whatever land they feel should stay as farmland that simple. So dumb shit Johnny pull yer head out we need no new Taxes..

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.