Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • jmill3 Email
  • JanetMarie Email
  • bmcintyre07 Email
  • Oldslow Email
  • davidbritton Email
  • envyoushawk Email
  • MrSinister Email
  • Guest Users: 753
Let's talk politics.
Tuesday, July 1st, 2008
Posted by David Wickert @ 09:20:48 am

I wasn’t able to reach County Executive John Ladenburg yesterday for comment on the County Council Rules Committee decision to table his land preservation proposal indefinitely. But the executive e-mailed me late in the day. Here’s his response:

As I said in my editorial, I think it would be good to let voters decide. They may decide the best time to buy open space is when prices are depressed and interest rates are low.
John W. Ladenburg
Pierce County Executive

Categories: Pierce County 1 comment

COMMENTS:

ldozy123 @ 11:11 - Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008 Email
f the proposal had continued in the same vein as Conservation, those wishing or needing to sell would be offered a fair market value while also providing the protection of Open Spaces. Most farmers, wet land owners etc. would be happy to sell given the right not to have their land taken by unfair zoning, undermarket valuation, etc. The proposal was significantly flawed and opened the door to out right forced purchase even if a land owner had no intent to sell, at any price the County chose to offer.
Another flaw was that it provided no process for selecting lands for inclusion and most importantly NO PROTECTION that the lands would remain factual Open Spaces. We all have read that the County has sold conservation and mitigation purchased lands when they choose. Current proposals pending in other counties have recognized this danger and have included the stipulation that sales must only be by VOTER approval- not county or government decision. Thats REAL protection for conservation lands.
The proposals concept isn't bad, just the hidden eminent domain threat wording and lack of real protection for assuring the safety of lands purchased for conservation were significantly its faults. Redo and resubmit.

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.