Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • dnksr Email
  • artman77 Email
  • Guest Users: 567
Let's talk politics.
Wednesday, October 1st, 2008
Posted by Joe Turner @ 09:50:05 am

Pierce County turned down last year's Proposition 1 by a greater margin than either of its sister counties up north, and there's even less for Pierce County (from a light rail standpoint) this time around.

The Sound Transit board designed a plan that puts a lot of light rail in King County and pushes up to Lynnwood in Snohomish County. But the main spine comes only as far south as the northern city limits of Federal Way, and never crosses the border into Pierce County.

Tacoma could get an extension of its downtown Link if the city or someone else ponies up half the money to match Sound Transit. Instead, Pierce gets more regional bus service and Sounder trains and parking at train stations.

Most of the e-mail feedback I've been getting from readers suggests they feel slighted by the plan.

All of which begs the question: Will King and Snohomish counties approve this second $18 billion plan by wide enough margins to overcome a predominantly "no" vote in Pierce County? It's an all-or-nothing proposition, by the way.

Here's a look at last year's results, county by county, for Proposition 1:

Pierce County
YES............54,333....42.61 percent
NO.............73,170....57.39 percent

King County
YES...........170,982....44.75 percent
NO............211,070....55.25 percent

Snohomish County
YES.........41,444......44.36 percent
NO..........51,993......55.64 percent

NOTE: I used only the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority votes, not the Regional Transportation Investment District totals of the combined ballot measure for 2007. For Pierce County, they were identical.
If you'll recall, the last ballot measure had about $11 billion for transit and $7 billion for highways.

Categories: Pierce County, Voting, Campaign news, King County, Transit 1 comment

COMMENTS:

JohnSN @ 12:44 - Monday, October 6th, 2008 Email
It's curious to me that Sound Transit's map showing completion dates for the various light rail extensions funded by Prop 1 shows every one of them not beginning to be in operation until 2020 or later. This map of the light rail lines, with opening dates, is shown at http://future.soundtransit.org/proposed.aspx .

The already funded light rail lines from downtown Seattle south to Sea-Tac Airport is shown for 2009, and north running University Link to Husky Stadium -- local funding complete; federal share pending -- is shown as 2016 completion. These lines don't need Prop 1 to keep on being constructed.

Prop 1 is 88% for light rail, and it's called "Mass Transit Now." 2020 is a funny definition of "now."

The 12% "now" part of Prop 1 is more Sounder service to Pierce County, and a small addition to Sound Transit's bus service that only covers one year's past growth in surging ridership because of gas prices.

Sound Transit could have spent some of our money to relieve crowding on buses for the next five years with a much more affordable and immediate transit improvement project.

Instead citizens are asked to keep standing on buses, and to pay in advance for standing on light rail trains (supposedly) opening twelve years from now. Fact: the capacity of the Sound Transit light rail cars built by Kinkisharyo is 74 customers sitting down and standing room for 126.

On top of that, the Prop 1 plan requires a vast increase in transferring from buses to trains at the new light rail stations, supposedly more efficient than one seat express bus rides to where you are actually going. Yet overall across the six west coast cities with light rail, the trains cost 12% more per rider to operate than the buses in the same cities.

Pierce County citizens may not like Prop 1 because it's too tilted toward King County, but I'm in King County, I ride transit, and I'm voting "NO."

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.