Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • davidbritton Email
  • gregoryrobinson Email
  • devisscher Email
  • teejay Email
  • benramm Email
  • Don Ruiz Email
  • Guest Users: 725
Let's talk politics.
Friday, October 3rd, 2008
Posted by Hunter George @ 11:26:56 am

From Les Blumenthal in our D.C. bureau:

In the end, none of them flipped.

The four Washington state House members who voted against the $700 billion Wall Street bailout Monday voted against it again today.

But another of the state’s Democrats, Rep. Jim McDermott of Seattle, switched his vote and opposed the financial rescue plan.

Others voting no were Republicans Reps. Dave Reichert of Auburn, Doc Hastings of Pasco, Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Deer Lake and Democratic Rep. Jay Inslee of Bainbridge Island.

All of them had been under increased pressure to switch their votes. But in the end, House leaders had well over the 12 votes they needed to pass the legislation. The final tabulation was 263-171.

“I just couldn’t do it,” said Reichert, adding that nothing had really changed from the earlier version of the bill.

Hastings said he was “mad as hell that the reckless actions of Wall Street created this situation” but that didn’t mean taxpayers should foot the bill for the “risky decisions” the financial community had made.

Rep. Adam Smith, D-Tacoma, who supported the bailout, said “this was not an easy vote, but we are not in easy times. This legislation, while not perfect, is necessary to address the weakness in our economy and protect and help the American people.”

Categories: Congress, Campaign news 9 comments

COMMENTS:

djknay @ 12:54 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008 Email
The end of America is near. May God help us.
jegggo @ 13:34 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008 Email
Adam Smith you piece of crap when are you going to grow a pair? Your a disgrace you soft soul. You should be voted out.
mustang @ 14:25 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilization has been two hundred years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from dependence back again into bondage."

The above two paragraphs were written in 1787 by a Scottish historian named Alexander Tyler. Just a little over 200 years ago. Scary isn't it!
bloodhound @ 15:12 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008
I offer the following link to an analysis done by Snopes about this quotation.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp
freedom_X @ 15:40 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008 Email
This demonstrates the bipartisan ignorance of our state delegation.

If the opponents of the bailout do so because they believe the banking and financial institutions of the U.S. economy are secure, that's one thing. That's an issue for debate, and a case can be made either way.

But if they oppose it on the grounds of "bailing out millionares" or "it doesn't do anything for ordinary homeowners", that is the height of ignorance.

The bailout's rationale is to prevent a credit crisis that will prevent businesses and ordinary people like you or me from borrowing money. It also has an objective of heading off a massive rash of bank failures. If the banking system collapses, we will have the Great Depression of 2010. Any economic slowdown you've experienced in the past 60 years will be nothing compared to what will happen if people lose confidence in the banking system.

Remember, even the most conservative banks have more money out in investments than they store in deposits. *Every and any* bank will collapse if people lose confidence in the bank and pull their money out. A rash of bank failures is exactly the trigger for a domino effect that would kill off healthy banks as well as bad banks.

Right now, the State of California can't borrow money to fund their state operations (7 billion worth.) So it's not a matter of "big business" or Donald Trump trying to get money to buy a yacht. It's states and cities getting financing for projects. It's you using your credit card or getting a car loan.

So, if they oppose it because they think there is no credit crisis, fine. I hope they're right. But if they oppose it off of half-baked homilies and the pressure of the mob scaring them, then they have no business leading this country. They're part of the problem, not the solution.
Skppr38 @ 16:07 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008 Email
There is no reason to socialize our financial system. This could have been solved by slashing and I mean slashing the capital gains tax, suspending mark to market (this is what would have happened with the S&L bailout of 80s and 90s if Mark to Market had been in place then) and slash the corporate income tax. Money would be pouring into the market. The fact that we have now put these lying crooks in charge (congress)of cleaning up the mess they helped create is disgusting. And for you liberals who say tax the rich, tell me one poor person who started a company and hired employees? A free market solution would help all of us and fill the goverment's tax coffers at the same time. Supply side economics. Learn it, love it, live it. It works every time it's tried.
janicegammill @ 17:17 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008 Email
Disgusting! People in the Congress should be investigated tried and hung!
As for Arnold begging for money. let him get it from Mexico since California is supporting its population! I left California in 07 the place is a cess pool. No worries, Washington will soon be one also if we keep giving foriegners all the bennies in the world.
mustang @ 17:21 - Friday, October 3rd, 2008
Thanks to bloodhound for the link to analysis of the Tyler quotations. I looked this quotation up solely because I recalled hearing part of it some years ago. It has been around for awhile. When I first heard it it didn't mean a heck of a lot but I remember when and where I heard it. It was in Economics 101 taught by Dr. Charles T. Battin, College of Puget Sound, in 1951. Whether or not Tyler made the remarks it certainly means something now.
SFDocBartman @ 08:53 - Monday, October 6th, 2008 Email
Adam Smith -

Well folks when is the re-election for this clown... He is in our area - and as I told him - he is supposed to represent the VOICE of the people who vote him into office. Those interested - let me know - he is OUT...

Perhaps he is closer to Barney Frank than we know?
You're not going to read about this in the NY Times.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,432501,00.html

Bart Heimsness
Graham, WA

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.