Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • Larry LaRue Email
  • Scipio Email
  • eropel Email
  • gregoryrobinson Email
  • benramm Email
  • envyoushawk Email
  • mzmarci Email
  • AKSeahawk12 Email
  • dianano Email
  • Guest Users: 622
Let's talk politics.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2009
Posted by Joe Turner @ 10:11:05 am

Rep. Al O'Brien, D-Mountlake Terrace, a retired Seattle police sergeant, has sponsored a bill to look into the possibility of surgically implanting tracking devices in sex offenders who have been released to the community.

His proposal, embodied in House Bill 1142, would hire the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs to see whether implanting "subcutaneous" radio frequency identification devices could be used economically to keep an eye on offenders.

The group would report back to the Legislature in December.

That RFID technology is what the state uses on the Narrows Bridge to electronically collect tolls from motorist. It's that little chip in the decal that we put on our windshields.

One thought that comes to mind is that scene from Total Recall, when Arnold Schwarzenegger's character realizes he is being tracked and pulls the huge bulbous device out of his nostril. I think of this only because, just as ex-cons sometimes disable their ankle bracelets, so too would some of them scratch the RFID tag out from under their skin.

Here's a link to the full text of the bill.

The bill has been referred to te House Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Committee, but I don't think it's scheduled for a public hearing yet.

Categories: Legislature, State government 9 comments

COMMENTS:

dbreneman @ 10:28 - Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 Email
http://tildebang.com
Such a plan would require the installation of RFID transceivers everywhere. Once that infrastructure is in place, government will find all sorts of other people and things it wants to track. Sorry, but in this case the cure is worse than the disease. This bill would "solve" the problem of rapists on our streets by making every citizen a virtual prisoner.
artrickwo @ 10:59 - Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 Email
Although you have a point there about being used improperly, much like the bailout packages are going to be used improperly as a "stimulus" by Obama; However, I certainly would want to do anything that I could to help keep these sick bastards from doing anything to my daughter.. wouldn't you? This officer means no ill-intent I'm sure, but as with EVERYTHING, depending on the hands in which it lays, can be used for good and evil. Its up to us to keep it used for good.. to often we roll over and play dead and do nothing, it't time we started doing something, break out the pitchforks and torches; Then and only then could we stop the evil uses of this and anything else.
n0t_thatgirl @ 11:01 - Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 Email
Part of me really likes this idea, what with all the sex offenders registering as homeless (why is THAT okay?!). The other part of me thinks it's creepy and eventually we'll all have tracking devices put in us for one reason or another.
fmrplt @ 11:15 - Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 Email
Another way of wasting money. Everyone (that has common sense) knows this is not the way to go. Stop wasting money on stupid 'studies'.

Which one of his relatives or friends would be doing the study? Keeping the family members employed and their businesses running with taxpayer money.
dbreneman @ 12:18 - Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 Email
http://tildebang.com
artrickwo, it makes no difference if the legislator means no ill-intent. Once the government has the power, it will use it; and there will be plenty of passive enablers coming to government's defense, saying "Why would you object - unless you have something to hide?" If these offenders are dangerous, let them rot in jail. Why threaten everyone with a government capable of snooping into things that are none of its business?
The_Tacomian @ 15:06 - Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 Email
This idea sounds good but where does it stop. Bush said that he was wire tapping people who made phone calls overseas but now it has come to light that he was listening in on phone calls from troops to their families in the U.S.


You give government the power and they will use it to the nth degree. We gave bush the power to go to war with Iraq and look how that turned out.


If this gets passed, count on it starting with sex offenders and then spreading to murderers, then people who commit assaults and then to everyone who is convicted of a crime. Next they will use it to store medical information for the public. Then they will find other reasons to use it and then everyone will have one.


Doing something in the name of tracking sex offenders is popular and gains lots of support because the crimes touch regular folk’s emotions. It is easy to condemn sex offenders and give them the harshest treatment but too many people are so self-righteous and put the weight of the world on the people who commit crimes and they never see their own flaws. These people who serve their time should be let out and be able to get jobs and support themselves and their families. If you overly diminish a person to the point that they think they cannot redeem themselves, then they will commit more crimes to make it in life. This directly contradictory to what we want to accomplish when dealing with these people. We say we want these people to learn form their mistakes and commit them again but we want to heap so much punishment on these guys that they can never get from under the position that they are in and progress in life. Everyone sins whether it is stealing a candy bar, shooting a person, having an affair, lying, abusing your children and having sexual relations with an under aged person. Everybody talks about what they will not do or could not do but in life things happen.


Remember that not too long ago, our own Chief of police shot and killed his wife and killed himself while his children watched. Biblically we have examples. Paul killed Christians before he became one. King David had a man killed because he longed for the man’s wife and Jesus was descendent of David. Solomon was the wisest king and he worshipped other Gods toward the end of his life. Peter denied Jesus three times. My question to you people who support this is this. If Jesus gave his life for our sins, how much of his shed blood would it take to redeem a sex offender? And can a sex offender be redeemed with Jesus’ sacrifice? You people who support this obviously don’t think that a person can do something wrong (although you are not perfect) and learn and change and be a better person. This is a wrong-headed idea.


In society sex offenders are the weakest link in the chain that we are all connected to. It we put too much stress on that link, the chain will break. No one is perfect and everyone has flaws. It would be prudent to help these people deal with their problems, learn from them and become upstanding citizens in our communities. We need to strengthen the weakest link, not make it weaker no matter how you feel about the crime. This will back fire and before long, we all will have this chip implanted in our bodies.

donny253 @ 17:26 - Wednesday, January 14th, 2009 Email
1984 Live? You could be Next! It starts out one way, and then it for parking...
m9078jk3 @ 02:54 - Thursday, January 15th, 2009 Email
During the past 50 years I have seen my country from having Constitutional rights to imposing warrantless searches (if done in "good faith",to imposing near $100,000 reasonable? bail amounts for misdemeanor charges,warrantless wiretaps,eminent domain to seize property for corporations,and impose cruel and unusual punishments.I am afraid that my country is turning into a police state tyrrany.
KingCthulu @ 15:55 - Thursday, January 15th, 2009 Email
How can we sit by idly and watch as those who wish to control us continue along un-fettered by reason or democratic process? It is already a sad statement that some even willingly wish to enslave themselves, and accept this technology with open, gullible arms. It will be sadder still if the day comes when the choice to use the chip becomes involuntary, because that will officially be the end of the American dream.

No longer will the love of freedom be the guiding force behind American ideals, but rather the love of power and control. No longer will the individual matter, but rather the system will be worshiped. As the range of "criminals" expand further to include the average person, we will increasingly find ourselves in the midst of a fascist state.

We will not be free citizens, but rather classed "citizens" and "illegals" who must beg their permissions from an increasingly totalitarian state. We will be tracked like human inventory. Freedom will be replaced with authority, and consent with begging permission. This would be a sad day for the Founding Fathers, as they would literally see what they fought and died for die in front of them.

Do not let this day come. Do not give in. If you love freedom--truly love freedom--then you know that this makes all of us less free. How can any of us be free when we isolate entire segments of the population, tag them and track them? How can any of us claim democracy when we are not asked permission whether or not we want these technologies? How can any of us be free when we still allow slavery?

I urge you to no longer wait. Get mad. Get writing. Spread the word. Don't let your congressmen forget who they really work for. We can't have a democracy if nobody tries. Remember, democracy is a contact sport, and it requires that we all get involved. The Founding Fathers knew intimately that it was in fact a free democracy that was the fragile, difficult path, as the slide into tyranny is an easy one.

We cannot forget these lessons, as most fascist states started out as open, free countries. We can no longer allow our disbelief of "It will never happen here" give way to the inevitable "It's already happened." Are we going to let this slip past us, or are we going to stop cowering to the fearful megalomaniacs currently in office? It's time we take back our country.

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.