Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
February 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • CustomScoop Email
  • dmon Email
  • FV Email
  • Guest Users: 330
Let's talk politics.
Monday, March 2nd, 2009
Posted by Peter Callaghan @ 03:10:28 pm

By an 11-1 vote, the House Education Appropriations Committee approved House Bill 2261 today. That keeps it alive past today's committee cutoff.

The bill is a place saver with a broad enough title to carry whatever compromise comes out before the end of session. It replaces House Bill 1410 which was the result of an 18-month examination by the Basic Education Finance Task Force.

Apparently the changes called for in that bill were too sweeping for the education community – the teachers union, the school directors, the school administrators and other education unions. While some endorsed the initial effort, others – led by the Washington Education Association – raised all sorts of objections.

At the same time, many groups outside the establishment – education advocacy groups and business leaders – were enthusiastic.

Rather than beat their heads against The Wall, the sponsors decided to take a step back and try to work through the objections. They figured that calling for an eventual 70 percent increase in ed funding would be enough for schools to come to the table and talk about increased accountability, transparency and fairness.

On Monday, no one objected though some had concerns. That led committee Chairwoman Kathy Haigh to say: "I'm much more encouraged that we're going to get the job done."

Here is how Rep. Ross Hunter, one of the so-called Gang of Six that wrote the bill, describes the process from now on:

We’re in the middle of a tumultuous period in the evolution of the bills. Our original bills (HB 1410 and SB 5444) were a 110 page first draft that we expected to engender a robust discussion. We were right about part of it - the discussion was robust, but unfortunately not substantive. The Olympia-based education groups have been very negative on the proposal, with most outside groups supportive. The legislation changes distribution of billions of dollars, and we were probably naive to expect change of this magnitude to go smoothly.

We’ve taken a new approach - we’re starting with a blank slate instead of a large first draft. We’ve introduced two bills with similar titles but no real content. The new bills are HB 2261 and SB 6048. We will move these bills through the system while we work on re-crafting a comprehensive bill. This is the strategy we used successfully in fixing the math standards last year.

Categories: Legislature, Education