Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • artman77 Email
  • Guest Users: 449
Let's talk politics.
Monday, March 2nd, 2009
Posted by Peter Callaghan @ 04:04:30 pm

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Tuesday in a case that could change how Washington elects judges – especially those for the state supreme court.

The case – Caperton v. Massey – is summarized in this Washington Post article. It involves the owner of a big coal mine in West Virginia who was sued by the owner of a small coal mine for driving him out of business. The little guy won initially but lost in a narrow state supreme court ruling.

In between the lower-court ruling and the supreme court ruling, however, was a campaign that saw an incumbent defeated with the help of $3 million from the owner of the big coal mine. And it was that new justice that provided the swing vote.

The U.S. Supremes will decide how and when a judge in a state like ours and 38 others that elects top judges must recuse himself when his political backers are before the court.

The issue has come up a few times in Washington when interest groups that have been involved in court campaigns come before the court. Generally, our judges don't step down temporarily. This case may provide guidelines and will definitely give fodder to those who think Washington should move to some sort of appointed judiciary.

If past decisions are a guide, the U.S. Supreme Court justices don't look kindly on states that elect judges. In one decision overturning limits on what candidates can say and do in campaigns, former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote this:


"If a state has a problem with judicial impartiality, it is largely one the state brought upon itself by continuing the practice of popularly electing judges."