Political Buzz

A team of experienced reporters keep you updated on what's happening in political arenas at the city, county, state and federal levels. From presidential campaign visits to who's running for city council, we've got it covered.

Contributors

Peter Callaghan is a local columnist. He’s covered the statehouse and state politics since 1981. Before joining The News Tribune in 1985, the Stadium High grad worked for newspapers in Everett and Lewiston, Idaho, and for The Associated Press in Olympia and Seattle. Email Peter

Joe Turner has covered state government and transportation issues since 1990. Since the Bellarmine grad’s arrival in the newsroom in 1978, he’s covered police, suburban cities, Tacoma City Hall, Federal Way City Hall and the Pierce and King county governments. Email Joe

David Wickert covers Pierce County government. Before coming to The News Tribune in 1998, he covered local government for newspapers in Illinois, Virginia and Tennessee. Email David

Ian Demsky is a general assignment reporter who specializes in database-driven reporting. He's been at the News Tribune since 2007 and has previously worked in Nashville, Tenn. and Portland, Ore. When he's not at work, he enjoys hiking and science fiction. Email Ian
Les Blumenthal has been covering Washington, D.C. for The News Tribune since 1990, focusing on issues and politicians involving the state. Before joining The News Tribune, he spent 13 years working for The Associated Press in Seattle, Illinois and Washington, D.C. Email Les

John Henrikson is a local news editor who oversees political coverage. He's worked as a journalist in the Northwest for 19 years, supervising coverage and reporting on local and state government, the environment and growth. Email John

Local politics links
Brad Shannon's The Politics Blog (The Olympian)
Adam Wilson (The Olympian)
Politics Northwest (Seattle Times)
Sound Politics
Horse's Ass
Richard Roesler's Eye on Olympia (Spokesman Review)
P-I's Strange Bedfellows (Seattle PI)
Crosscut
SoundInfo Databases
State Employee Pay
Statewide School Employee Pay
City of Tacoma Employee Pay
Pierce County Employee Pay
King County Employee Pay
Metro Parks Employee Pay
City of Lakewood Employee Pay
City of Puyallup Employee Pay
Pierce Transit Employee Pay
Other Resources
Washington Legislature Bill Lookup
How your lawmaker voted: WashingtonVotes.org

Calendar
February 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • cames75 Email
  • Guest Users: 370
Let's talk politics.
Tuesday, April 28th, 2009
Posted by Melissa Santos @ 01:54:40 pm

Puyallup's contentious proposal to have all its city council positions elected by a citywide vote may be dead in the water, despite receiving initial approval from a majority of the city council last week.

Councilman Mike Deal, who voted in favor of the proposal on first reading last Tuesday, now says he's changed his mind. Citizens shouted their opposition to the proposal to eliminate council voting districts at last week's council meeting, prompting Puyallup police to review recordings of the meeting to see if any citizens engaged in disorderly conduct.

Deal said in an e-mail today that he doesn't think it's right to make all council positions citywide after some of this November's council candidates have already begun to campaign in their neighborhood districts. If Deal changes his vote and the other council members maintain their positions, the at-large proposal will fail 4-3.

East Pierce County readers can find out more about Puyallup's at-large city council proposal in tomorrow's edition of The Herald.

Click 'more' to see the e-mail Deal sent to me and other members of the City Council today.

[More:]

After having some time to reflect on last week's city council meeting, and the dust-up regarding at-large vs. council districts, I have decided to change my position. I still believe that all council positions, elected city-wide, are the most democratic. All citizens get to vote on all seven positions, instead of just three. Having said that, I don't believe now is the time to make that change.

Several individuals have already filed paper work with the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, declaring their candidacy for council positions, to be elected by council district. I believe that it is unfair to change the ground rules in the middle of campaigns.

I am going to support adding the new populations from the West Hills annexation to existing council districts. We are, according to state law, supposed to follow natural boundaries and straight lines as much as possible, when drawing district lines. The line, separating council district one from council district two, from west to east, does not. However, it is unfair to the current incumbent to move him into a different district during an election year.

I believe that a future council, after the 2010 census has been completed, should address these irregularities, and the issue of council districts vs. all positions at-large. Accordingly, I will not vote to change to an all at-large council.

Categories: Suburbs