Eric D. Williams took over the Seahawks beat and Seahawks Insider blog in December. Williams has covered the Seahawks, Sonics and high school sports for The News Tribune since joining the paper in 2006. Eric lives in Tacoma with his wife and two children.
Tacoma News Tribune columnist Dave Boling also contributes to the Seahawks Insider blog.
- All
- Answers to your questions (511)
- Audio Files (358)
- Awards and honors (79)
- Brock Huard Analysis (22)
- Coaching Decisions (38)
- Coaching Staff (77)
- Flashbacks (7)
- Former Players (78)
- Front office (40)
- Paul Allen (6)
- Game Coverage (1229)
- Injuries (537)
- Interviews (64)
- Media Issues (33)
- Mike Holmgren press conferences (87)
- Minicamps (116)
- Miscellaneous (238)
- National Seahawks Coverage (67)
- NFL Draft (265)
- 2006 Seahawks Draft (37)
- 2007 Seahawks Draft (72)
- Draft-pick Signings (18)
- Mock drafts (16)
- Rob Rang Analysis (43)
- Scouting combine (36)
- NFL Europe (7)
- NFL free agency (363)
- Cuts and waivers (73)
- Character Issues (23)
- Restricted free agents (RFAs) (15)
- Street free agents (71)
- Tryouts (40)
- Unrestricted free agents (UFAs) (99)
- Cuts and waivers (73)
- NFL Meetings (39)
- Notes from practice (189)
- Off the field (137)
- Charitable endeavors (32)
- Legal system (61)
- Offbeat Stuff (51)
- Officiating (71)
- Opponents (152)
- Playoff picture (20)
- Predictions (41)
- Quotes (182)
- Matt Hasselbeck (18)
- Mike Holmgren (32)
- Shaun Alexander (13)
- Radio Shows (41)
- Roster Analysis (58)
- Schedules and calendars (40)
- Seahawks Insider (301)
- Blog News (282)
- Programming Note (223)
- Stadium/facilities (13)
- Stats, etc. (124)
- Excel Downloads (106)
- Draft-related files (9)
- Seahawks Roster (78)
- Statistics (97)
- Excel Downloads (106)
- Trades and potential trades (71)
- Training Camp (182)
- 2006 Training Camp (137)
- 2007 Training Camp (141)
- Video (8)
- Xs and Os (39)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
- July 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (29)
- May 2009 (32)
- April 2009 (89)
- March 2009 (56)
- February 2009 (63)
- January 2009 (51)
- December 2008 (151)
- November 2008 (191)
- October 2008 (203)
- September 2008 (164)
- August 2008 (175)
- More...
First, Matt Hasselbeck said he hyperextended his knee but should be fine. He looked to be in a lot of pain to me, limping out of the locker room. I'm sure that thing is going to swell of overnight and get sore. He said he was able to twist with the knee when he got hit, which saved him from being injured more severely. He said he didn't think it was a late hit -- I did -- but that it was just playing football.
Mike Holmgren said Deion Branch was the only serious injury. He did not specify how long he would be out but said it was a heel injury. Now, this is speculation that we will never know, but you do have to wonder if this injury has anything to do with coming back too early. I know it is not the same leg or the same injury, but in the same way that Marcus Tubbs was injured last year, I believe your body compensates in other parts when one part of you is weak. Perhaps this is completely separate and not related, but it does raise the question.
Holmgren did not seem overly angry in his postgame news conference, but I will say he was serious and stern. He essentially said that this team needs to do a very honest evaluation, with no sugarcoating, and fix what is wrong. I asked him for some preliminary thoughts on what the problems were and he said that he needs to look at film and will address it more on Wednesday. Deon Grant seemed to think that players are trying to do too much and are not taking care of their own business. Everybody needs to look in the mirror and make their own corrections before trying to fix somebody else's mistakes.
Holmgren said that if the leadership on the team is lacking from the players in place, then they are going to have a big problem with the Big Show. He said he felt this was not similar to the Buffalo game except in the final score. There, he said, there were some unusual circumstances with the special teams and weather and stuff. Today, he said, was a butt-kicking. Give the Giants credit, he said, but he thinks the Seahawks are not playing up to their potential. And they better fix it. And now.
He was not really willing to answer the question about East Coast travel. He basically said his box is pretty full just digesting the loss and he doesn't have a lot of room to stand on the sideline and consider the other stuff.
Lofa Tatupu once again used the word "embarrassing." The defense, understandably, was not in a very good mood. They did not say they were overmatched, but they did talk about missing a lot of tackles. My argument is that you missed tackles perhaps because you were overmatched, but, hey, that's only one man's opinion.
Hasselbeck said the offense was pathetic on third down conversions (1-11), the reason they struggled so badly. He said one of their goals to run outside on the Giants, but when they fell behind so quickly they went away from that. He said he looked up at the scoreboard at one point, and usually he does the math in his head for what they have to do to make a comeback. But when it was 24-3, "the numbers started getting big," he said.
COMMENTS:
The whole run under Holmgren/Hasselbeck looks fraudulent when you consider these records.
Wilson and Jennings are now (if they weren't already) on the list of being closer to busts than good/productive players. They can join Tapp (2nd) and Spencer (1st) as players that were drafted high, but aren't producing like they should for where they were picked.
When's the last time the Seahawk defense managed to get a pass rusher to the QB untouched? Marshall's pass rush packages are very predictable - the players get no help from the scheme. If they get a sack, it's because players physically beat their man (or the opponent makes a mistake.) The NFL has too much parity to depend solely on physical talent. The scheme has to contribute.
Ah, here's one of the idiots that was singing "Don't Worry--Be Happy" after the debacle in Buffalo. And back with the same old B.S. after another ass kicking on the road. You never learn do you? Moron. This team got it's ass handed to hit twice this season, and lost to San Francisco at home, and the only team it's beaten is the worst team in the league. It's lost 5 road games in a row stupid, and has lost it's road games this season by a 78-16 score. How freakin' stupid are you that you can't realize this is a bad team that can't win on the road and is poorly run and poorly coached? Well I know the answer, pretty damn stupid.
Spencer a bust...lol.
Lets face it guys. We didn't get outcoached. We got outplayed. We have a glaring weakness at corner opposite Trufant, and teams are exploiting it. I should have kept count, because it seemed to me that a majority of their passes were towards the right side of our defense, toward Jennings and Wilson. Both are a liability at this point. I wouldn't be objective to starting Babs at this point.
Hopefully we can get some consistency out of our WRs. 4 games, 4 differents sets of starting WRs is not how an offense develops chemistry and consistency.
They talk a good game but the results speak for themselves.
Can somebody fix something...PLEASE!
I am tired of having a fast finese team that gets physically beat by a more emotionally intense opponent.
No guts, no glory.
just because we suck doesn't mean you need to call someone stupid fifteen times in one paragraph. predicting mediocrity is not a sign of intelligence.
i do think it's a good point that someone else brought up in that we're just undersized in a lot of positions and trying to bring someone like jacobs down in that situation makes it even more apparent.
WE ARE TOO PREDICTABLE.
I didn't even watch the game to know that we ran the same plays that we ran during our Super Bowl years. Mike your a GREAT coach but unless we change our plays a little the good/great teams are going to eat us alive.
But call Branch "a sissy"... well, if you're stupid enough to make that claim, you deserve to have the "obvious" exception to your reasoning called out. You don't get any mulligans for shoddy logic.
With your vast, encylopedic knowledge of the NFL, find me one player, coach or scout that thinks Branch is a wimp (sissy, malingerer, hypochondriac, whatever synonym you like.) They may say he gets hurt a lot, but I defy you to find any quote where they think he lacks heart or guts.
Of course, the essence is that you can't argue against someone or something without demeaning it. When your main line of reasoning involves an insult, it deserves what it gets.
How many of them have given up?
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.

