Seahawks Insider
where there is no offseason

Eric D. Williams took over the Seahawks beat and Seahawks Insider blog in December. Williams has covered the Seahawks, Sonics and high school sports for The News Tribune since joining the paper in 2006. Eric lives in Tacoma with his wife and two children.

Tacoma News Tribune columnist Dave Boling also contributes to the Seahawks Insider blog.

Blogroll
Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • dsquid Email
  • artman77 Email
  • Guest Users: 438
Seahawks Insider
Wednesday, November 12th, 2008
Posted by Eric Williams @ 04:52:59 pm

It was a busy day at the Seattle Seahawks practice facility this afternoon, with both quarterback Matt Hasselbeck and wide receiver Deion Branch returning to practice and preparing to play against Arizona on Sunday.

The team went with just helmets and shells, as Mike Holmgren attempts to ease off the players with no serious hitting during practice. However, the practice remained brisk. With Hasselbeck back, the offense seemed to have more rhythm and move at a quicker pace. Even the huddle breaks were crisper, as the team seemed to respond to having their leader back on the field.

"It felt good," Hasselback said about practice. "I've been working really hard to get back. I've been wanting to get back for a long time. And you know, the first step was this weekend getting cleared by the doctors to practice. Hopefully, for everybody practice all week goes well."

[More:]

Hasselbeck says he still has to be cleared to play by Dr. Stan Herring of Seattle, which could happen this evening.

Hasselbeck said pain was not the main factor with his injury, but more of a concern was the nerve aspect of the injury. Hasselbeck said he wanted to play after the Giants game on Oct. 5, but team doctors would not clear him because of the weakness in his knee. That led Hasselbeck to get another opinion from Dr. Robert Watkins in Los Angeles, who confirmed the same diagnosis Seattle team doctors had given him. And all Hasselbeck could do at that point is wait until the strength in his knee returned.

Listen to part of the conversation with Hasselbeck here.

The Seahawks practiced inside because of the rain. Hasselbeck looked better than he did Friday, but still doesn't look like his old self. Branch seemed to move well and looked explosive running his routes.

And, I know we've said this before, but Courtney Taylor, pictured above, looked comfortable running routes and said he's ready to make plays now that he's back in the receiver rotation.

Asked what he learned by sitting on the sidelines, Taylor had this to say:

"I think that's what I really learned -- that you have to go all out on every play," Taylor said. "Especially at this level. Playing against our defense (on scout team), I took a step forward in that aspect of the game."

Branch said after practice that this is the best he felt since he's been in Seattle. He'll practice this week, and if cleared by the training staff he'll play on Sunday.

"It was just good to be on the field with the team," Branch said. "These guys have been working so hard, and for me I'm just trying my best to get back on the field, just seeing these guys go out there and playing in the game, out there fighting every week."

Tight end Will Heller (knee) also returned to practice and should be ready to go on Sunday. Floyd "Pork Chop" Womack also practiced today, getting the majority of the reps at right guard over Ray Willis.

David Hawthorne (calf) went through some individual drills early but did not finish practice.

Players who did not practice include Red Bryant (ankle), Julius Jones (ill), Koren Robinson (knee), C.J. Wallace (hamstring), Seneca Wallace (groin) and Leonard Weaver (ribs). Robinson sitting out was just a precaution. Patrick Kerney (shoulder) also did not go, and will not play this week.

Categories: Notes from practice 32 comments

COMMENTS:

OutSydeDog @ 17:19 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
Ahhhh.....it's soooo good having Matt back :)

GO SEAHAWKS!!!
BobbyK @ 18:05 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
If any AZ defender takes a cheap shot on Hass, I think the team needs to respond. I don't care if it's Tapp running 20 yards onto the field and diving at the spine of a Cardinal defender... there needs to be one clear message... leave our leader alone or we will cheap shot you in return and we will take out Warner and Leinert with flagrant 15 yard penalties and suspensions if need be...

Good to have Matt back!
moeflo @ 18:07 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
Nooooo Eric! It's Kerney, not Kearney. :)
As for the rest of it, I'm glad Matt is back at practice.. I really do hope he plays Sunday.
hawk9680 @ 18:44 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
Is there any truth to the NFL reports that Greg Knapp will replace Haskell at the end of the year?
Dukeshire @ 18:58 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
I've not hear that rumor, but he and Mora do have a history, so that makes some sense.

It is good to hear players are getting healthy, now if that translates to wins, I'm skeptical. Having good players on the field is one thing, having them play well is another. God, a win would feel good.
tcbaytown @ 19:00 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
As reported on Rotoworld:

Seahawks to hire Knapp?
Seahawks Offense - TM - SEA - Nov. 12 - 6:37 pm et
NFL Network's Steve Wyche reports that the Seahawks are expected to hire current Raiders offensive coordinator Greg Knapp to fill the same position in Seattle after the season.
Move aside, Gil Haskell. Jim Mora, who will take over for Mike Holmgren in 2009, worked with Knapp during their stint together in Atlanta. Knapp runs a West Coast offense like Haskell and Holmgren currently have in place, but uses fewer three- and four-receiver sets. The offensive production in Seattle will threaten to go down if this marriage happens. Nov. 12 - 6:37 pm et
BobbyK @ 19:17 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
How can our offensive production go down any more?
DDP1983 @ 19:20 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
Paragraph 3, Hassel"back"... very nice... Made me chuckle... :)
Dukeshire @ 19:26 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
Lol, that is a good question. Maybe he'll take a fungo to the healthy players' knees.
mocarob @ 21:07 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
"Branch said after practice that this is the best he felt since he's been in Seattle."

Well yeah, He's played one game in 10months.
He should feel rested.
JRhawks @ 21:16 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
ahhh...why did San Fran run that stupid running play at end of Arizona game, with their back up yet(did Homegren call that play or what?). how sweet that would have been to get. We'd still have some slight hope, and with many injuries behind us, and 2 games against Ari, who knows what could have happened. I saw many signs of the Cardinals still being the Cardinals in that game.

They better enjoy their Division win this year, 'cause WE WILL BE BACK NEXT YEAR.
dhardw @ 21:45 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
I will say it again. When dealing with a back injury, there is no reason to risk having Matt play this year. He should be getting ready for 2009.
Leroyhill @ 23:29 - Wednesday, November 12th, 2008 Email
I will not cut Jimmny MoRON any slack if he hires Knapp, and I hope other Hawks' fans will feel the same way. I am just getting really irritated by the way Timmy Rascle running thing. There is no justification for replacing Haskell with Knapp. It's not even a comparison when you look at the track record of Haskell and Knapp. I don't care if Hnapp is Moron's friend. If they do that, I will chalk it up as a debacle in the same category as Hutchinson's departure.
OutSydeDog @ 00:53 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
If Holmgren just up and quit, and after an "exhausting search", they hired a new coach, he would most likely bring in all new assistants. How many holdovers did Holmgren have when he came in? The fact that Mora was hired beforehand, I would hope that that represents some kind on continuity in the franchise, with Mora's stamp. Haskell's not bad, and I don't know much about Knapp, but it doesn't make sense to mess with the offense that Matt's been running for the better part of ten years. What's really more important is to stand up to AZ this weekend, and play some ball.

GO SEAHAWKS!!!
bigmike04 @ 00:57 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Tim Russell does know how to build average team in Atlanta that all they were with Mora Jr just average team who only has 1-1 record in playoff count it 2. What make Russell think this guy should lead hawks team who been to playoff and to SB to hand it over to him....

Hawks need coach who got proven track record and not going to bring in coaches who didnt do so good in Atlanta. They were average team at best.
ElPerroGrandeIII @ 06:07 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Branch ... OH BOY ... a sold number 3 receiver, the few games he is healthy each year that is, who Matt Millen, oops, excuse me, Tim Ruskell game up a first round draft choice for ... I want to puke everytime I see Deion on the field ...
BobbyK @ 06:11 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
They went to the NFC Championship game in Mora's first year in Atlanta. That's not so bad. It's a hell of a lot better than this season for us.

Mora is going to bring a good change for '09. The team is going to win the division (with a halfways decent off-season) and we are going to make a run at getting to and winning the Super Bowl.

I'm not worried about Mora taking over. It's going to be good. Anything less than 10-6 (in a relatively injury free season to the key cogs like Matt and Walt) will be unacceptable though.

I'm excited for '09! But I want to beat the damn Cards this weekend and run the table until we're officially eliminated --- then it's Wrotto, Adams, Bumpus, etc. time.
DSAhawker @ 06:57 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008
http://www.freewebs.com/dsahawker
Speaking of Adams...

I want them to give that kid a shot at playing now. He is a good player and a ball hawk, there isn't any doubt about that. His college resume is a lot stronger than his draft position would suggest...

I say activate him and let him play some snaps when Russell or Grant need a breather. It won't be much, but he'll see the field and actually get some experience and a chance to showcase his skills...plus he's got special teams too.
CowboysP @ 08:47 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Did anyone hear that KIRO is switching to an all sports format in April. This is a good thing.

KIRO. Please put on the national sports shows. Stay away from the local biased homer sports guys. The other station, with local biased dj's, create these false expectations for teams, leading to a high level of disappointment and despair with the Seattle sports fan base.

Who outside of Seattle picked the M's to win the AL West? Nobody. Who outside of Seattle, other than Holmgren, picked the Seahawks in the Super Bowl? Nobody.

KIRO. Please bring a national perspective (and reality)to the Seattle sports fan base. Thank you.
Dukeshire @ 08:53 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
"His college resume is a lot stronger than his draft position would suggest..." He wasn't drafted, amazing
I'm glad to see other people now starting to call for Adams, too. He and Hobbs are the two guys I'm most interested in seeing get some time (assuming this season continues down this road) in the secondary.

No offense to anyone here, but in amazes me that some of you go from running the table to playing the practice squad all in one sentence. FYI, reality exists somewhere in between.
tacchad @ 09:54 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
guess who's back...back again...Hass is back...tell your friends.
jammer @ 11:26 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Wow, big deal, next will be the excuse that Branch hasn't played much this year because of injury and as such has not got his timing down. Somehow this will buy him a pass, when he just is a bust here.

This was a bad trade when Ruskell made it and is now obviously a bad trade. He hasn't even come remotely close to justifying his $39 million contract or the 24th pick in the '06 draft we gave up for him. Truly he isn't a #1 WR. He has been slow in learning the offense and otherwise hurt and not available 1/3 the rest of the time.

The Seahawks have hurt their cap in signing him and he hasn't produced, of course we're locked in with him and he will do nothing much for the rest of the year, see above excuse, and cost us quite a bit more next year. It's too bad we can't unload his unproductive fragile tiny rear end but the cap hit for doing so puts us in an Alexander situation again. Next season we pay Branch >$6.5 million.

I hated this trade when we made it and note that it marked the second big goof of the '06 season by Ruskell who had previously lost us our Pro Bowl player at LG who was then the best OG in football. After that the next spring he traded WR-Jackson our true #1-WR for an offensive line player a project who hasn't seen the field yet and left Hasselbeck without a reliable #1 the next offseason. Don't argue with Ruskell he will trade you, the consequences to the team are irrelevant. Branch our Ruskell #1 meanwhile has done nothing much and he has had 105 catches in 192 attempts 54.6%, has been active for 26 of 39 games 66%, and has produced 8 TDs and a measly 1417 yds or 54.5 yds /game since arriving here. If he were on the Patriots still they would have cut him for lack of production or demoted him. Those stats don't come close to justifying his salary or him being a #1 WR.

The team has so undervalued the WR position beyond our diminutive hope in Branch that despite a year where Engram is the #6 WR in the league he doesn't get a new deal, and we draft nobody even when we know that Branch is hurt again and won't likely be available for at least half the season. As well we let go another WR who was able to make big plays happen because he too was injury prone. Naturally when Engram got hurt as well we were screwed. The other injuries showed how thin the depth was for the team. Who are the playmakers at WR? Do we even have one young player who is a budding star at WR?

Meanwhile the fans got to pay for a third rate product and get to watch an emasculated offense, an underperforming defense, and Trader Tim escapes accountability for very poor management. He in 3 seasons has spent the hard earned capital of the Holmgren period and not replaced the key parts of the team he denuded. The poor product we have seen this year confirms the O is a shadow of it's 2005 version and the future isn't looking that good.

We deserved better.


nighthawk2 @ 11:39 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Cowpee, if the idea of local sports stations focusing on local sports or being fans of the local teams (which the morning crew is not, they're Raider and Dolphin fans), then go listen to ESPN radio or, hmmm, some Cowboy radio station.

The coach(es) I want to see replaced besides the DC are the strength and "conditioning" coaches. With the rash of injuries this squad has I think it's time for a change there.
nighthawk2 @ 11:40 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Meant to say: Cowpee, if the idea of local sports stations focusing on local sports or being fans of the local teams (which the morning crew is not, they're Raider and Dolphin fans), BOTHERS YOU, then go listen to ESPN radio or, hmmm, some Cowboy radio station.
da_hawks @ 12:11 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
I just read this - Posted 11/10 Knapp
"Raiders offensive coordinator Greg Knapp was stripped of his play-calling responsibility last week and told that he won't be used in that capacity for the rest of the season"

Not a good sign.


Glad to see players getting healthy and looking forward to a good game Sunday.

Go Hawks!
da_hawks @ 12:13 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
My bad heres the link - http://www.mercurynews.com/49ers/ci_10951168?nclick_check=1
CowboysP @ 12:51 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Nightduck, You missed the point, as usual. Mitch and Sandmeier are very good, and very objective. Softy is also very good, but as we all know, including him, he is a homer, at least on the air. The rest of the day is filled with a variety of Seattle cheerleaders. This is understandable, and I'm sure the listeners like the Seattle view.

But the problem is that MANY on this station (not Mitch) were pumping up the Seahawks as Super Bowl favorites prior to the start of the season. This wasn't the case anywhere but in Seattle. And many (more like most) of the Seahawks fans bought into this "Super Bowl favorite" thinking.

When the season went from "SuperBowl Favorite" to "2 and 7", many fans felt "completely let down" and wanted to find a scapegoat for the perceived disaster (i.e. Ruskell, Branch, Mora, others).

The reality is that the Seahawks were not a Super Bowl team at the beginning of the season, but are also as not bad as the 2 and 7 record would indicate. The Seahawks are a team in transition. Transition to a new coach, transition to some new players, and likely a transition to new systems at the end of the season, after Mora takes over. Mike Sando on ESPN has said this many times.

If the "disappointed" Seahawks fans had realized that the Seahawks were NOT a Super Bowl team at the beginning of the season, the negative over-reaction, resulting from the extreme disappointment, likely would not be occurring.
nighthawk2 @ 12:54 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
I'll say it again Cowpee, since reading comprehension skills aren't you're strong suit. If you don't like a local station focusing on local sports, if you don't like local radio and media being fans of local teams then go somewhere else.
CowboysP @ 12:54 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Wanted to provide something from KJR.com. Statement from Jim Mora, Jr., on October 31st.

"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Friday, October 31, 2008

Last off season, Paul Allen, Tim Ruskell and the rest of the Seahawks organization displayed unique generosity in signing me to a long term contract. This gesture guaranteed me the opportunity to coach one of the very best organizations in all the NFL and the opportunity for my family to live in our favorite place in the world.

In turn, I made a commitment to the Seattle Seahawks. It is a commitment and challenge that I am excited to tackle.

I love the University of Washington. I will always bleed purple and gold. But I will honor the promise I made to the Seahawks exactly as I would if the roles were reversed.

-Jim Mora Jr."
nighthawk2 @ 13:08 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Swell, but it's old news.
Leroyhill @ 17:52 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
Jammer: I couldn't have agreed with you more. Where are our Hawks fan? Did the team's play put all of them to sleep? Ruskells is not getting any flak for the play of the defense.

Branch: I think he is okay player if healthy. Even if he had turned out to be a star, I still maintain my opinion from the beginning that Rascle is a poor negotiator. When New England was dangling Branch for a trade, the only teams that were interested was the Jets and Hawks. The season has started already, and teams were not interested. But NE was not going to trade it to the Jets. It was just the Hawks. It was a buyer's market. Yet, Rascle was fooled in to coughing up a 1st round pick. He could have given NE a 2nd round pick and NE would have done cartwheels. A 5'9 receiver is not worth a 1st round pick unless he is extremely explosive like Smith (Carolina Panthers). Given that the market was in our favor and it was a small receiver, why bid against yourself and gave a 1st round pick? Pure stupidity.

Furthermore, he keeps on drafting small guys with no speed. For example, Daryl Tapp is barely 6 ft tall but he is no Dwight Freeney because he doesn't have an explosive first step. Same problem with Jackson. Same problem with Jennings. If a player is small, he must have killer speed. Why can't our front four put pressure on opposing QB? It is because of Rascle.
SharkHawk @ 19:02 - Thursday, November 13th, 2008 Email
The Jets offered a 2nd and the Pats used that to "negotiate" with (meaning... bend over) Ruskell. They even said BEFORE negotiating with Seattle that they would NOT trade Branch to the Jets, yet they still leveraged the Jets offer into a first rounder from the mighty Timmy.

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.