Post-Sonics Watch
Feeling lost without your Seattle SuperSonics? Seattle-area NBA fans face their first season without an NBA team in 41 years. Primarily, our coverage here will focus on the City of Seattle’s attempt to bring the NBA back to Seattle. But we also will provide updates on the Portland Trail Blazers, the Oklahoma City Thunder and area players plying their trade for other teams in the NBA.

Eric Williams covered the Sonics' last season in Seattle. A Tacoma native, Eric graduated from Mount Tahoma High and the University of Puget Sound.

Other sites of interest:

Hoopshype.com

Sonicscentral

SuperSonicssoul

Blazersedge

Blazersblog

BehindtheBlazers

Barrett'sBlazerblog

Blazerbanter

ThunderRumblings

Category
Calendar
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Archives
XML Feeds
What is RSS?
Misc
Who's Online?
  • BrettinBonneyLake Email
  • babytigers Email
  • pugetsnd Email
  • PhilKenSebben Email
  • gmurphy Email
  • pcoddin Email
  • DavidS_ Email
  • dburbridge Email
  • Liv4funnwa Email
  • MrSinister Email
  • smoothsayer Email
  • azwildcat09 Email
  • Guest Users: 736
Keeping an eye on the NBA and Seattle's efforts to get back into the game
Tuesday, March 25th, 2008
Posted by Eric Williams @ 09:13:58 pm

Here's the full transcript of the Tuesday's press conference in Oklahoma City that included Sonics chairman Clay Bennett, NBA Commissioner David Stern and Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett.

Opening Statements:

Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett: I’d personally like to thank Commissioner Stern, his NBA staff and the members of the Relocation Committee that came to Oklahoma City today and allowed us to give our presentation. We had a number of Oklahomans who were there, many of them as part of the presentation but also there in a support role.

[More:]

Former Mayors Humphreys and Norick, Mayor Kathy Taylor from Tulsa was down in a support role, Governor Keating, Governor Henry were on hand, Mike Holder, the Athletic Director at Oklahoma State, Joe Castiglione from the University of Oklahoma, Bob Stoops, the Oklahoma head football coach was in the room; as well as the entire ownership group of the Sonics franchise.

So, it was a great show of support and I think symbolic of Oklahoma City’s long or at least through two years support of the NBA in this city, and I think (it) reflects well on our stance that we are a perfect relocation site for an NBA franchise. Commissioner, thank you very much for all of the attention that you gave us today.

Bennett: It’s a very proud day for me. I’m very proud of Oklahoma and Oklahoma City, of our Ford Center, of our recent vote to improve the building, and the demonstration of state, local, civic, business, political leadership that was in the room today was really extraordinary and was unified on a common goal of bringing the NBA to Oklahoma City.

So, I’m thrilled to sit here today having completed the process of the day and survived the Commissioner’s many questions, but hopefully we responded well and showed well and again, I just think it’s a great day for the city and a proud moment for our group and I think should be a proud moment for all of Oklahoma.

Stern: Well, we were here with eight members of the NBA staff, including myself, and we want to also really say special thanks to Lewis Katz, an owner of the New Jersey team; Herb Simon, an owner of Indiana and Jeannie Buss, an owner of the Lakers for their full day in the work and analyzing this.

At the last moment, Peter Holt was not able to make it. We had an extraordinary tour of the current Ford Center with a complete demonstration using the latest technology and a lot of footwork to demonstrate how it will be brought up to be a state of the art NBA arena should the team relocate here.

And, in the afternoon session, we were presented with an in-depth look at the economy of the state of Oklahoma and various sectors in depth that I don’t think we had previously had presentations on.

And, to Clay and the Mayor’s point, the array of support in that room by former Mayors, former Governors, current Mayors, current Governors, the leaders of the legislature and the business community were quite extraordinary. And those that weren’t there in person were there in video presentations covering virtually every sector from aviation to education to medical research and medical care to the energy industry.

It was quite an extraordinary demonstration of the breath and array of the assets that are Oklahoma and the support that was going to be forthcoming. On the basis of the various materials that have been prepared previously and distributed to the committee, which were reviewed by them and the presentation today at a meeting subsequent to the presentation, the three members of the committee concluded that they would recommend to the Relocation Committee that it recommend that the franchise be permitted to relocate from Seattle to Oklahoma City.

That meeting will take place between now and April 17th, whether it is in person or telephonically, most likely telephonically with a report prepared, and then whatever that committee decides will be reported to the Board for action on April 17th. Is that the Thursday or the Friday? The Thursday? April 18th. That’s the day of Paul Revere’s ride. You didn’t know that did you? And that’s our days work and I guess we’re all here to answer questions.

Q: I wanted to ask you, Mr. Bennett, about the state-side of incentives package. You talk about the Quality Jobs program. Why change the Quality Jobs program and not ask for a direct appropriation from the legislature?

Bennett: Well, we just believe that a revenue neutral approach to the state is appropriate and we think this is a significant economic development pursuit that Quality Jobs was really designed to address and that the expansion now to include this particular sector was appropriate. So, we think it is a fair and reasonable approach.

Q: Did you ask for an appropriation originally?

Bennett: No, we did not.

Q: Clay, what were some of the questions from the Commissioner that you survived?

Stern: Well, those are an executive session. He’s not allowed to – if they ask you anything publicly – the rest are covered by the Commissioner/Owner privilege, but he did get shorter.

Q: Commissioner, what did you learn today about Oklahoma City that you didn’t already know?

Stern: We knew about the support of the team and the Hornets and how well this community responded to the tragedy of Katrina, but we hadn’t been through, in effect, the soon-to-be re-modeled Ford (Center) and seen the plans and the care for some combination of loges and sky suites and restaurants and food service and you know, outdoor roofs, and very modernistic design that is really going to move this Ford Center into the first rank of NBA arenas.

And, I would say there’s just something about being in the room with all of the people who are in charge, for the Governor to talk about the quality of jobs, legislation with both leaders of the legislature there; for the mayor to take us through the MAPS program with respect to his predecessors and him for the head of the business units to take us through, really, the breakdown specifically through video travels of the aviation industry, the medical research industry, indeed the 18 universities that are here – to have it graphically spoken to the Committee with respect to the continued flow of quality jobs and quality graduates to fill those jobs, the per capita income, the lower cost of living – I think in its totality as it was presented, it had a great influence on the Committee members, it was very impressive and one understands why it is more than simply Oklahoma City, it is Oklahoma.

I thought that the Mayor of Tulsa being there was extraordinary. The support, the editorial today in the Tulsa paper – you can tell I’m a New Yorker – was, I thought, generous and meaningful to our ownership. And, we learned a lot about the economy of the state of Oklahoma and its demographic and a little bit about its geography. And I’m not sure I quite believe that there’s never been a traffic jam between Tulsa and Oklahoma City so that you can always make it in 89 minutes, but that’s me, and I’m a skeptical New Yorker, but we learned a lot about that. And there was a fair amount of discussion on DMA’s and standard market definitions and the proximity and the like. It was a pretty full explication and pretty much a tour de force on behalf of Oklahoma that I’d say impressed the members of the Committee greatly.

Q: Commissioner, what will your role be in terms of aiding the franchise with its negotiations with Seattle?

Stern: Well, I’m available to Clay and to Seattle, as I’ve always been. I would say I’m completely available. But there is a lease to be honored, there’s a court deciding whether that lease has to be honored by the payment or has to be honored by the team being physically there. There is an interesting issue because if the team is there for the remainder of the lease. We’re assured that the construction necessary on Ford Center will be complete by the time the team comes here. But I think there may or may not be a discussion to have about a fair settlement for both sides. I’m certainly prepared to participate in that fully and look for some fair resolution.

Q: Mr. Bennett, you called this a proud day. Do you feel we sealed the deal today?

Bennett:
We made important progress today, and this was a serious meeting, a lot of information. The league is represented by their professional staff with some very impressive people who know what they’re doing and know the questions they’re asking. More evaluation will come from meeting and more discussion, and of course we had some very experienced owners here who know about the business, know a lot more about the business than certainly I do. A lot more to be done, but a very important step. I think it was a very successful day, and we look forward to the next step.

Stern: We had with us lawyers – we never travel without lawyers; we had team marketing people who were testing and stressing assumptions; we had our chief financial officer; we had our construction expert; and we had … and then there was just the rest of us -- Joel Litvin, Adam Silver and myself … we just sort of came along for the ride, the Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner and the President of the League and Basketball Operations.

But there was a group represented here that did a lot of work before we got here, has been pushing at Clay and his team, and are as anxious as I think the members of the committee were to hear the presentation and to learn of the depth of support for this project in Oklahoma.

Q: If the funding for the existing arena hadn’t been approved, would you be as positive about this as you are?

Stern: No chance. Ford Center was a great temporary facility. It is not the facility of tomorrow and the $100-plus mullion that were allocated and approved overwhelmingly by the taxpayers was a huge statement and actually how that is going to be spent and the ways for locker rooms and every possible amenity is really what makes this an NBA arena.

Q: Can you talk about the difference between Oklahoma City and Seattle?

Stern: I think Seattle is actually a terrific market; it just doesn’t have an NBA-ready arena of the future. That’s been agreed by both parties for many years, so it’s a very strong market that has in fact supported NBA basketball over the years. When you come to a place Oklahoma, you look for the single-team market as opposed to for example a market that has three or four major professional sports leagues.

You look for that. You look for a kind of support that Mayor Cornett has spearheaded, really, years before we brought the Hornets here. And then you look for the statement from the fans which are here with respect to the Hornets support, which I think the Committee feels can be extrapolated to their own team. And the array of support – the Governor was forceful in his presentation with assistance from the leaders of the Legislator were here; the Mayor was forceful; the business community was forceful. It was really extraordinary.

So, you look for something that says, on paper this is a small community but then you recognize that it’s a well-populated state in a certain way. It’s got important businesses and you are going to have to make your estimates of the kind of support. And I think the Committee members that were here had come to the belief that the extra, the supercharging aspects of it, were present here in the presence of the sectors represented and the fact that this would be the sport, not just in town, but in state. And we got a pretty good primer on sports in this state, starting with the Sooners, but going to the Cowboys and also focusing, I might add – I would be remiss returning to New York and the WNBA, without adding there appear to be two women’s teams still in the hunt. So this is a sports market that cuts across gender and we got a little bit of a lesson on that as well. It was pretty impressive.

Q: Mr. Bennett, can you talk about the upcoming trial and how the city of Seattle is trying to keep you in Seattle until 2010?

Bennett: Well, we are prepared to engage in the trial and we are prepared to abide by the rules.

Stern: I would sort of step in and say that it is not a question of force, but rather enforce. The question is, what is required under the lease? If the lease can be satisfied by the payment of money, that’s one thing. If it can’t, then it’s got two more years to run after this. That’s just what happens when you either sign or inherit documents. We respect that and I know that the owners of the Sonics respect that.

Q: Commissioner, how do you react to people who have ridiculed Oklahoma City as a viable NBA city?

Stern: I think that facts and education ... there were people who actually ridiculed the notion that we would have an All-Star Game in New Orleans. I would say it’s been our most successful All-Star Game in a very long time … Weekend. So, and questions were raised by players and they learned what we were doing, etc. I daresay, what the owners on the Committee would tell me that if in fact the players had seen what we saw, and they will in an abbreviated form, shortened form, that they would not have said that.

Q: Mr. Bennett, what is on the personal agenda for Clay Bennett tonight?

Stern: This is live on NBA TV, you know that, don’t you? (laughter) It’s going to be recorded for posterity.

Bennett: Relax a bit, maybe. It’s been a busy time and this is a demanding business, but it’s also very energizing, so I am absolutely committed to this process, and view today as a very important step, and, again, I am very pleased and very proud of how we shoed. Happy tonight. Sleep well tonight.

Q: Commissioner, how will the Board vote giving the pending court case? And will you continue to encourage the ownership group to seek a buyout?

Stern:
I would say the following: The Board of Governors, if in fact the Committee recommends – remember this is a sub-committee of the Committee that’s recommending this to the Relocation Committee. If the Relocation Committee recommends it to the Board and the Board votes in appositive fashion, they will do so recognizing that everything is subject to the terms of the lease in Seattle. Period.

So the approval will be with respect to whenever the team is free to move they will be approved to move. With respect to the ... I would say there are pros and cons to the timing of the move, but on balance we would as I answered earlier recommend to Clay and the ownership group that they negotiate in good faith if there is another party to negotiate with for a monetary settlement of the terms of the lease and possible beyond for the benefit of Seattle and I would be willing to participate in that if I could be constructive. And Clay agrees. (laughter)

Q: Mayor, with the sales tax passed and today’s proposal, what’s left for you to do?

Cornett: I’ve been all ears. This has been enlightening because we spent a lot of time and attention on making our presentation, making our case. And to hear the feedback that was apparently generally positive was refreshing to say the least. Our citizens have done everything we asked them to do. We asked them to support that team two years. They did. We asked them for the opportunity to improve the Ford center. And they’ve given us the go-ahead to do that.

So, really the ball was back in our court as city leaders to try and convince this Relocation Committee to bring the team to Oklahoma City. It’s another step in the relocation process and this is really an if-when scenario. The part of Oklahoma City’s involvement is if the team is going to come. We don’t have any part to play in the when the team might arrive here. But we are very involved in the if and this is another significant step.

Stern: The Mayor is too modest because he told me he personally is going to get overalls and supervise the reconstruction; although they are going to be smaller than when I first met him. (laughter)

Q: Mr. Bennett, how confident can the citizens of the city be that you won’t come back and ask for more improvements or a new arena?

Bennett: I’m pretty confident. We expect to play in the Ford Center for a long time. It will be among the top tier of buildings in the country. It provides the revenue streams that are important for our model. We like the building very much. And we think these improvements are going to enhance the fan experience and provide what we need for a business and certainly provides a very exciting bowl and atmosphere and for games. We like the building and it’s our anticipation that we will be there for a long time.

Q: Some people in Seattle have said all they need to do is wait this thing out. If the Relocation Committee votes to move the franchise, are you committed to wait until 2010 to move?

Bennett: Yes

Stern: Yes.

Q: There’s been talk of donors in Seattle willing to donate half the cost to keep the team in Seattle. What is the status of that and how willing would be if that happened to keep the team in Seattle?

Stern:
The reason that this journey began was because Key Arena was not an adequate arena going forward and there were a lot of recommendations made for another arena, plans and the like. But the tax revenues and the various contributions weren’t forthcoming, and I’d say that as far as we know, the footprint of Key is at the present time is not viewed at the present time as adequate to support what’s necessary going forward.

One of the interesting things about the Ford Center is when it was built it was built to a large footprint – I think over one-half million square feet … 580. And they are talking about adding 300,000. Key Arena is a much smaller footprint. I think it’s in the threes. Also, as far as I know, we have owners there that own the team and they’ve told us based on the present state of the record and their inability to get any assistance, that the team is not for sale and the application for a move has been made. The Sub-Committee is going to recommend to the Committee and the Committee will make its recommendation. Then there will be a move to Oklahoma City if it gets approved, whether it is the end of this year or two more years.

Categories: NBA 12 comments

COMMENTS:

BigPurpleDawg @ 21:52 - Tuesday, March 25th, 2008 Email
I'M TO UPSET TO POST WHAT I'M THINKING; I WOULD PUNCH STERN IN THE FACE; WHAT A ASS,I GOTTA GO,THE NBA HAS LOST IT,ERR STERN IS A IDIOT. REALLY PISSED OFF.
moo @ 00:30 - Wednesday, March 26th, 2008 Email
A Big F@#! You to David Stern, Clay Bennett & Howard Shultz. It's really a shame that a local boycott of Starbucks would have 0 impact.

The only way this makes any sense to me is that Stern & Shultzie got so angry at Wa & Seattle politicians that they did this intentionally as pay back. The Ford center will produce higher revenues that a remodeled Key Arena? Yeah, right.

The only positive from this is that we won't have to watch the NBA's worst team any longer (though Bennett is 100% to blame for how bad they are; I suspect that's part of the EVIL plan).

I sure with their was a way to file a class action law suit that would cause serious financial harm to these B@#tards.
joedon @ 03:59 - Wednesday, March 26th, 2008 Email
Okay, So here's the deal. With the threat of litigation and the Sonics having to stay in Seattle for 2 more years to fulfill the terms of their lease, why don't we do some negotiating? Clay has said he is willing to give up the Sonic's name, colors, and history, right? Since he is close buds w/Dave Stern why don't we negotiate a deal whereby we let them have the Sonics if Dave promises to give us a new franchise for the local ownership group or first right of refusal on any franchise that is relocating. Do this, sign on the dotted line and if agreed to, we keep everything (except the group of players formerly known as the Sonics, and everyone is happy!? OKC is going to get a team one way or the other, and it seems like a much more complicated and difficult fight to keep this group of players with OK ownership that has said over & over again, the team is not for sale! Let's do what we need to do to keep an NBA franchise here in Seattle and if Dave Stern is unwilling, then we fight, if he is willing & signs on the dotted line, we keep the NBA in Seattle.
moo @ 04:49 - Wednesday, March 26th, 2008 Email
joedon, if we can get that IN WRITING, in a legally binding document, that sounds like a very good idea. However, unless it's a legal document, I don't trust Stern as far as I can throw him.

Notice Stern just stated AGAIN, that no amount of improvements would make Key Arena acceptable. What a load of c... that is.
Tazio @ 12:09 - Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
I am DONE with the NBA. They can shove it up their @sses.

Screw you Stern and Bennett and Schultz!

I've been cheering for the Sonics since '78, when I was twelve. Thanks for throwing it in my face!

I'll never watch another NBA game. Go Hawks!
joedon @ 20:08 - Wednesday, March 26th, 2008 Email
moo, you're right, of course! It would have to be a legally binding agreement but I think that if Seattle wins the lawsuit that OKC & Sonics ownership (regardless of what is being said) will have a tough time waiting for 2 years. I think under these circumstances, negotiation is very possible and I think that a reasonable and acceptable agreement can be reached for both parties. You're right about Dave Stern! What a PUTZ! He is definitely not a friend to the city of Seattle however, I'm sure if his bud Clay is stuck in Seattle for another couple of years that Dave will become all sweet & mushy & want to be our friend again! A real two-faced S._.B! And another thing you pointed out! When did Key Arena become a "not acceptable" NBA venue? You're dead on there! TOTAL & COMPLETE CR_P! I was sort of wondering though, if they are planning on spending $300M for a renovation, wasn't a brand new arena supposed to cost $500M? It almost seems like we should spend the extra $200M & build a whole new facility. My only thinking is that $300M is a lot to spend on a renovation that will not change things much vs an entire new facility? Anyways, keep the faith!
joedon @ 20:10 - Wednesday, March 26th, 2008 Email
moo, you're right, of course! It would have to be a legally binding agreement but I think that if Seattle wins the lawsuit that OKC & Sonics ownership (regardless of what is being said) will have a tough time waiting for 2 years. I think under these circumstances, negotiation is very possible and I think that a reasonable and acceptable agreement can be reached for both parties. You're right about Dave Stern! What a PUTZ! He is definitely not a friend to the city of Seattle however, I'm sure if his bud Clay is stuck in Seattle for another couple of years that Dave will become all sweet & mushy & want to be our friend again! A real two-faced S._.B! And another thing you pointed out! When did Key Arena become a "not acceptable" NBA venue? You're dead on there! TOTAL & COMPLETE CR_P! I was sort of wondering though, if they are planning on spending $300M for a renovation, wasn't a brand new arena supposed to cost $500M? It almost seems like we should spend the extra $200M & build a whole new facility. My only thinking is that $300M is a lot to spend on a renovation that will not change things much vs $500M for an entire new facility? Anyways, keep the faith!
docpepsi @ 22:34 - Thursday, March 27th, 2008 Email
They keep saying Key Arena is too small. It doesn't seem to matter since they aren't selling it out anyway! If a bigger arena is needed why not play in the Tacoma Dome, and not have to deal with the sorry Seattle polititians. I guess that wont work if those investor guys insist on Key Arena being the place they want to refurbish.
joedon @ 04:52 - Friday, March 28th, 2008 Email
docpepsi,
Not a bad idea! I don't know how much it would take to bring the T-Dome up to NBA (Dave Sterns) standards but it would certainly provide a bigger venue. I think despite what you would gain in south end fans you would definitely lose a percentage of north end fans and Seattle area thinking that T-Town is too far to go! And since I have the pleasure of making that commute home every day, I can tell you that the traffic can be a serious nightmare!
docpepsi @ 22:27 - Sunday, March 30th, 2008 Email
I'm sure if the T-dome became an NBA arena they could make some special sounder train runs from Seattle to Tacoma, and back!
docpepsi @ 22:30 - Sunday, March 30th, 2008 Email
Going forward, David Stern is full of xxxx. He shoulda told Ackerly that the arena remodel in 1995 was not adequate or to NBA standards going forward. Going forward I'm now a fan of the Portland Trailblazers going forward because I refuse to support Gay Bennett going forward.
Eric Williams @ 07:24 - Monday, March 31st, 2008 Email
Docpepsi: I'm pretty relaxed as to what can be said here but watch the language please. Thanks, and otherwise I appreciate your comments.

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. Please login or register to comment.